Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Senate Bill 202

Appeals of denials of kinship care payments based on arrest or conviction record. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 2, 2016. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 26, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 6, 2015

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 9, 2016

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 166

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 2, 2016: “Published 3-1-2016”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, monthly kinship care payments may be made to a relative of a child (kinship care relative) who is providing care and maintenance for the chid if certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that the county department of human services or social services (county department) or, in Milwaukee County, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) conducts a background investigation of the kinship care relative, any employee and prospective employee of the kinship care relative who has or would have regular contact with the child for whom the payments would be made, and any other adult resident of the kinship care relative's home to determine if the kinship care relative, employee, prospective employee, or adult resident has any arrests or convictions that could adversely affect the child or the kinship care relative's ability to care for the child (arrest or conviction record). Current law permits a person who is denied kinship care payments based on arrest or conviction record to request a review of that decision by the director of the county department (county director) or, in Milwaukee County, by a person designated by the secretary of children and families to conduct those reviews (secretary's designee). Under current law, the decision of the county director or secretary's designee is final and is not subject to further administrative review.

This bill permits a person who is aggrieved by a decision of a county director or secretary's designee denying kinship care payments based on arrest or conviction record to petition DCF for a hearing on that decision. Under the bill, DCF must give the petitioner an opportunity for a fair hearing, and the decision of DCF after the hearing is final, subject to judicial review or to revocation or modification as altered conditions may require.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. 2 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health and Human Services vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 22, 2015

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Family Law vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 2, 2016

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 2, 2016

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 166.

  3. Feb 25, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 9, 2016

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 3, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 3, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  7. Dec 8, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Nov 13, 2015

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Family Law.

  9. Nov 9, 2015

    The Assembly received it.

  10. Nov 6, 2015

    The Senate passed it.

  11. Nov 6, 2015

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  12. Oct 22, 2015

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  13. Oct 22, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jun 26, 2015

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  15. Jun 26, 2015

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 26, 2015 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators LeMahieu, Harris Dodd and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Vorpagel, Knodl, Krug, Mursau, Quinn, Spreitzer, Subeck and Thiesfeldt

  2. Jun 26, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health and Human Services

  3. Oct 22, 2015 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Oct 22, 2015 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Oct 22, 2015 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  6. Oct 22, 2015 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Nov 5, 2015 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-6-2015 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Senator Bewley added as a coauthor

  9. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Read a second time

  10. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  12. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Nov 6, 2015 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Nov 9, 2015 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. Nov 13, 2015 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Family Law

  16. Dec 8, 2015 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  17. Feb 2, 2016 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  18. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  19. Feb 3, 2016 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  20. Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 by Committee on Rules

  21. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  22. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Feb 25, 2016 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  29. Feb 25, 2016 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 2-25-2016

  30. Mar 2, 2016 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 2-29-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 166

  31. Mar 2, 2016 · Senate

    Published 3-1-2016

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote