Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: requiring or allowing persons who have committed certain offenses related to drunken driving to acquire an ignition interlock device in order to operate certain motor vehicles and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)
Drunken driving Implied consent or alcohol concentration Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Motor vehicle — Equipment Transportation, department of — Vehicles
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, no person may drive or operate a motor vehicle while under
the influence of an intoxicant or drug, with a prohibited alcohol concentration, or
with a measurable amount of a controlled substance in his or her blood (OWI). A
person who does so is subject to penalties that increase, in terms of forfeitures or fines
assessed, periods of imprisonment imposed, and periods of time during which the
person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle is suspended or revoked, with each
subsequent offense. Current law allows most OWI offenders, after a waiting period
that increases with each subsequent OWI offense, to apply for an occupational
license that allows the person to operate a motor vehicle for certain limited activities
and within certain limited geographic boundaries.
Under current law, a law enforcement officer who arrests a person for an OWI
offense may request the person to take a chemical test to determine the amount of
alcohol in his or her blood or breath. Under certain other limited circumstances, the
officer may request the person to take the test before he or she is arrested. If the
person refuses to take the test, the officer takes possession of the person's driver's
license and issues the person a notice that the Department of Transportation (DOT)
will revoke the person's driving privilege for a minimum of one year and a maximum
of three years, depending on how many prior OWI offenses the person has committed.
Under current law, refusing to take a chemical test is counted as an OWI offense.
If the person takes the test and the test indicates that the person has committed an
OWI, the officer takes possession of the person's driver's license and DOT
administratively suspends the person's operating privilege for six months.
Under current law, a person whose operating privilege is administratively
suspended or revoked may, within ten days, submit a written request for DOT to
review his or her administrative suspension or revocation. A person whose operating
privilege is administratively suspended for failing a chemical test may apply for an
occupational license immediately. A person whose operating privilege is
administratively revoked for refusing a test may apply for an occupational license
after 30 days for a first OWI offense, after 90 days after a second OWI offense, and
after 120 days after a third or subsequent OWI offense. However, if the person has
committed two or more OWI offenses within the five years, current law requires him
or her to wait 12 months before he or she may apply for an occupational license.
Current law also requires DOT to administratively suspend or revoke a person's
operating privilege when it receives notification that a person has been convicted of
committing certain OWI-related offenses in this state or in another state or on tribal
land. The periods of suspension or revocation and the waiting periods for each
offense vary, but generally increase with the seriousness of the offense and the
number of prior OWI offenses the person has committed.
In addition to the administrative suspension for failing a test and the
administrative revocation for refusing a test, when a person is convicted of an OWI
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Cowles (R) , Harris Dodd (D) , LeMahieu (R) , Wanggaard (R)
26 cosponsors
Ballweg (R) , Barca (D) , Doyle (D) , Edming (R) , Heaton (R) , Hintz (D) , Horlacher (R) , Jacque (R) , Kahl (D) , Kitchens (R) , Krug (R) , Kulp (R) , Macco (R) , Quinn (R) , Ripp (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spiros (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 5, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 5, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jul 31, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Cowles, Carpenter, LeMahieu and Harris Dodd; cosponsored by Representatives Heaton, Jacque, Sanfelippo, Subeck, Sinicki, Kitchens, Rohrkaste, Horlacher, Krug, Ripp, Edming, Ballweg, Quinn, Macco, Spiros, Kahl and Kulp
- Jul 31, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Aug 4, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 4, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 10, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 10, 2015 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 1, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard
- Feb 3, 2016 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 4, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 5, 2016 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 5, 2016 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 19, 2016 · Senate
Representative Zepnick added as a cosponsor
- Feb 19, 2016 · Senate
Representative Stuck added as a cosponsor
- Feb 19, 2016 · Senate
Representative Barca added as a cosponsor
- Feb 19, 2016 · Senate
Representative Spreitzer added as a cosponsor
- Feb 19, 2016 · Senate
Representative Wachs added as a cosponsor
- Feb 19, 2016 · Senate
Representative Sargent added as a cosponsor
- Feb 24, 2016 · Senate
Representative Doyle added as a cosponsor
- Feb 24, 2016 · Senate
Representative Hintz added as a cosponsor
- Feb 24, 2016 · Senate
Representative Shankland added as a cosponsor
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1