Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: applying financial accountability provisions that currently apply to certain tax incremental districts to all tax incremental districts created by a city or village. (FE)
Property tax Revenue, department of Town Village
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
under certain conditions. Currently, a town or county also has a limited ability to
create a TID under certain limited circumstances. Before a city or village may create
a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public
hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and
adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID,
approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board,
approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board (JRB) that
consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of
a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date
provided in the resolution.
Under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue
(DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized
value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the
development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base
value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value
increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax increment
is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the
TID.
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or
village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing
costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the
allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23
years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year
in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally
make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended
termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the
expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.
Under current law, a city or village may adopt a resolution, subject to JRB
approval and not more than once during a TID's life, requiring DOR to redetermine
the tax incremental base of a distressed TID that is in a decrement situation that has
continued for at least two consecutive years. "Decrement situation" is defined as a
situation in which the current aggregate equalized value of all the taxable property
within the distressed TID is at least 10 percent less than the current value of the
TID's tax incremental base. DOR may charge the city or village $1,000 for the
redetermination.
Under current law, before a town board that is authorized to create certain
types of TIDs under the general TID law that applies to cities and villages may
approve a project plan, the town board must ensure that the project plan specifies
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Feb 10, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 21, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Nass and Vukmir; cosponsored by Representatives Craig, Kremer, R. Brooks, Thiesfeldt, Neylon, Brandtjen, Jacque and Horlacher
- Sep 21, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations and Consumer Protection
- Oct 2, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 21, 2015 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 10, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 10, 2016 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 10, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1