Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: reporting, disclosure, and practitioner review requirements under the prescription drug monitoring program; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Controlled substance board Drugs Drugs — Criminal acts and law enforcement Medical service Pharmacy Physician
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes a number of changes to the Prescription Drug Monitoring
Program (PDMP) administered by the Controlled Substances Board (board).
Under the bill, a pharmacy or practitioner generating a record under the PDMP
when a monitored prescription drug is dispensed is required to submit the record to
the board no later than 11:59 p.m. of the next business day after the monitored
prescription drug is dispensed. Currently, there is no specific time frame required
for the submission to the board of a record generated under the PDMP.
Under current law, the rules promulgated by the board implementing the
PDMP must specify the persons to whom a record may be disclosed and the
circumstances under which the disclosure may occur, including disclosure to
relevant state boards and agencies, relevant agencies of other states, and relevant
law enforcement agencies under circumstances indicating suspicious or critically
dangerous conduct or practices of a pharmacy, pharmacist, practitioner, or patient.
The bill adds disclosure to relevant prosecutorial units, and the bill specifies that
disclosure of a record generated under the PDMP is authorized under the following
additional circumstances:
1. The state board or agency, agency of another state, law enforcement agency,
or prosecutorial unit makes a written request for the record and is engaged in an
active and specific investigation or prosecution of a violation of any state or federal
law involving a monitored prescription drug, and the record being requested is
reasonably related to that investigation or prosecution.
2. The state board or agency, agency of another state, law enforcement agency,
or prosecutorial unit makes a written request for the record and is monitoring the
patient as part of a drug court.
The bill further permits disclosure to a practitioner, pharmacist, registered
nurse, or substance abuse counselor who is treating or rendering assistance to the
patient for whom the record was generated and under other specific circumstances.
Finally, the bill authorizes disclosure of a record generated under the PDMP to
a person who medically coordinates, directs, or supervises, or establishes standard
operating procedures for, a practitioner, pharmacist, registered nurse, or substance
abuse counselor to whom records may otherwise be disclosed, if the person is
evaluating the job performance of the practitioner, pharmacist, registered nurse, or
substance abuse counselor, or is performing quality assessment and improvement
activities, including outcomes evaluation or development of clinical guidelines, and
if the disclosure is limited to only those records about the practitioner, pharmacist,
registered nurse, or substance abuse counselor.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Cowles (R) , Darling (R) , Gudex (R) , Hansen (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Marklein (R) , Olsen (R) , Petrowski (R)
36 cosponsors
A. Ott (R) , Allen (R) , Barca (D) , Born (R) , Edming (R) , Genrich (D) , Horlacher (R) , J. Ott (R) , Jagler (R) , Kerkman (R) , Knodl (R) , Kolste (D) , Kuglitsch (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Macco (R) , Meyers (D) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Novak (R) , Nygren (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Petersen (R) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Schraa (R) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spiros (R) , Subeck (D) , Swearingen (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tranel (R) , VanderMeer (R)
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 16, 2015 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 29, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Gudex, Cowles, Marklein, Olsen, Petrowski, Hansen and Darling; cosponsored by Representatives Nygren, Petryk, Novak, Tauchen, Swearingen, Spiros, Jagler, A. Ott, Ripp, Kolste, Kerkman, Schraa, Ohnstad, Horlacher, Sinicki, Murtha, Edming, Loudenbeck, VanderMeer, Genrich, Meyers, Allen, Barca, Petersen, Kuglitsch, Knodl, Mursau, Macco, Sanfelippo, Born, Skowronski, J. Ott and Subeck
- Sep 29, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health and Human Services
- Oct 2, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 12, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 13, 2015 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 13, 2015 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 15, 2015 · Senate
Representative Murphy added as a cosponsor
- Oct 16, 2015 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 16, 2015 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 2, 2015 · Senate
Representative Tranel added as a cosponsor
- Nov 6, 2015 · Senate
Representative Shankland added as a cosponsor
- Jan 7, 2016 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1