Senate Bill 309
Use of the reasonable and prudent parent standard for making decisions concerning the participation of a child placed in out-of-home care in age or developmentally appropriate activities, permanency planning for a child 14 years of age or over, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Feb 4, 2016. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 9, 2015
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 12, 2016
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jan 19, 2016
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2015 Wisconsin Act 128
Latest entry in the official record, Feb 4, 2016: “Published 2-5-2016”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Introduction Recently, Congress enacted the Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act, which makes certain changes to Title IV-E of the Social Security Act regarding: 1) use of the reasonable and prudent parent standard for making decisions concerning the participation of a child placed in out-of-home care in age or developmentally appropriate activities; and 2) permanency planning for children 14 years of age or over placed in out-of-home care. A permanency plan is a plan designed to ensure that a child who is placed outside the home is reunified with his or her family whenever appropriate or that the child quickly attains a placement or home providing long-term stability. This bill incorporates those changes into the Children's Code and the Juvenile Justice Code.
Reasonable and prudent parent standard The bill incorporates the reasonable and prudent parent standard into the Children's Code and the Juvenile Justice Code by doing all of the following:
Read the full summary Show less
1. Requiring a foster parent, guardian, relative other than a parent, or nonrelative in whose home a child is placed; the operator of a group home, residential care center for children and youth, or shelter care facility in which a child is placed;
and, in the case of a child placed in a group home, residential care center for children and youth, or shelter care facility, a staff member employed on the site of that home, center, or facility who has been designated by the operator of that home, center, or facility as an out-of-home care provider for purposes of making decisions concerning the child's participation in age or developmentally appropriate activities (out-of-home care provider) to use the reasonable and prudent parent standard in making decisions concerning a child's participation in age or developmentally appropriate extracurricular, enrichment, cultural, and social activities. The bill defines "reasonable and prudent parent standard" as a standard for an out-of-home care provider to use in making decisions concerning a child's participation in those activities that is characterized by careful and sensible parental decisions that maintain the health, safety, best interests, and cultural, religious, and tribal values of the child while at the same time encouraging the emotional and developmental growth of the child.
2. Requiring the agency that places, or that arranges the placement of, a child with an out-of-home care provider or the agency assigned primary responsibility for providing services to the child, at the time of placement, to: a) provide to the out-of-home care provider information that is specific to the child for the out-of-home care provider to consider in making reasonable and prudent parenting decisions concerning the child's participation in age or developmentally appropriate extracurricular, enrichment, cultural, and social activities; and b) explain to the out-of-home care provider the parameters of those considerations. The bill requires that information to be prepared in consultation with the child and, if reasonably possible to do so, the child's parent and requires that consultation to also occur and those parameters to also be explained at the time the permanency plan is prepared and each time the permanency plan is revised.
3. Requiring the Department of Children and Families (DCF) to promulgate rules: a) requiring all foster parents to receive training in the use of the reasonable and prudent parent standard in making decisions concerning a child's participation in age or developmentally appropriate activities; b) requiring all residential care centers for children and youth, group homes, and shelter care facilities to employ on the site of that center, home, or facility at all times a staff member designated as an out-of-home care provider for purposes of making those decisions (designated out-of-home care provider) and requiring those designated out-of-home care providers to receive that training; and c) requiring foster parents and designated out-of-home care providers who have received that training to make those decisions in accordance with the reasonable and prudent parent standard.
4. Providing that an out-of-home care provider who grants permission for a child to participate in an age or developmentally appropriate activity is immune from civil liability for any act or omission in granting that permission if in granting that permission the out-of-home care provider applied the reasonable and prudent parent standard in accordance with the requirements of the bill and any rules promulgated by DCF under the bill.
5. Requiring the permanency plan for a child whose permanency goal is not to be returned to his or her home or to be placed for adoption, with a guardian, or with a fit and willing relative, but rather to be placed in some other planned permanent living arrangement, to include a plan to ensure that the child has regular, ongoing opportunities to engage in age or developmentally appropriate activities determined in accordance with the reasonable and prudent parent standard.
6. Requiring the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the Children's Code and the Juvenile Justice Code (juvenile court) or a permanency plan review panel (panel), in reviewing the permanency plan of a child placed in a planned permanent living arrangement, to determine the steps taken by the agency to ascertain whether the child has regular, ongoing opportunities to engage in age or developmentally appropriate activities and to ensure that the child's caregiver is applying the reasonable and prudent parent standard to decisions concerning the child's participation in those activities.
Permanency planning This bill incorporates the changes that the federal Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act made with respect to permanency planning into the Children's Code and the Juvenile Justice Code by doing all of the following:
1. Permitting the permanency goal of placement of a child in a planned permanent living arrangement, other than the child's own home or the home of an adoptive parent, guardian, or fit and willing relative, only in the case of a child 16 years of age or over. Current law does not specify an age limit for that permanency goal.
2. Requiring the agency that prepared the permanency plan for a child placed in a planned permanent living arrangement to present to the juvenile court or panel, on review of the permanency plan, information showing that intensive and ongoing efforts were made by the agency, including searching social media, to return the child to the child's home or to place the child for adoption, with a guardian, or with a fit and willing relative and that those efforts have proved unsuccessful.
3. Requiring the juvenile court or panel, in determining the continuing necessity for and the safety and appropriateness of a placement in a planned permanent living arrangement, to include in that determination an explanation of why the planned permanent living arrangement is the best permanency goal for the child and why it continues not to be in the best interests of the child to be returned to his or her home or to be placed for adoption, with a guardian, or with a fit and willing relative.
4. Requiring the agency primarily responsible for providing services for a child who has been placed in out-of-home care for six months or more to ensure that the child is in possession of a certified copy of the child's birth certificate, a social security card, information on maintaining health care coverage, a copy of the child's health care records, and either a driver's license or a state-issued identification card (identification documents and other important information) during the 90 days before the child attains 18 years of age or the child's juvenile court order terminates, whichever is later.
5. Requiring the agency responsible for preparing the permanency plan for a child 14 years of age or over to prepare the plan in consultation with the child, requiring the permanency plan for such a child to include a plan to prepare the child for the transition from out-of-home care to a successful adulthood (transition plan), and requiring a child's transition plan to include a document that describes the rights of the child with respect to education, health, visitation, and participation in juvenile court proceedings, the right of the child to receive identification documents and other important information as required under the bill, the right of the child to receive a copy of his or her credit report, and the right of the child to stay safe and to avoid exploitation. Current law requires a transition plan only for a child 15 years of age or over.
6. Eliminating placement in sustaining care as a permanency goal for a child following a termination of parental rights. The bill, however, permits: a) a child 16 years of age or over who is in sustaining care under a sustaining care contract entered into before the effective date of the bill to remain in sustaining care until the termination date of the contract; and b) a child under 16 years of age who is in sustaining care under a sustaining care contract entered into before the effective date of the bill to remain in sustaining care until the next permanency plan review or hearing for the child, at which time the child's permanency plan must be amended to provide for a permanency goal other than placement in sustaining care.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Republicans.
8 more lawmakers .
See all 11 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Terry Moulton · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (8)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Loudenbeck · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Health and Human Services vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 8, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Feb 4, 2016
The new law was published.
-
Feb 4, 2016
The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 128.
-
Feb 3, 2016
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 19, 2016
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jan 14, 2016
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 12, 2016
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 12, 2016
The Senate passed it.
-
Jan 8, 2016
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Jan 6, 2016
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 8, 2015
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 5, 2015
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 27, 2015
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 9, 2015
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.
-
Oct 9, 2015
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 9, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Petrowski, Moulton and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Loudenbeck, Kleefisch, Kitchens, Kulp, Murphy, A. Ott, Sinicki and Skowronski
- Oct 9, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health and Human Services
- Oct 27, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 5, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 5, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 8, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 6, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 6, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 8, 2016 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 8, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 11, 2016 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-12-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 12, 2016 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 12, 2016 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 12, 2016 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 12, 2016 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 12, 2016 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 12, 2016 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 14, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 14, 2016 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-19-2016 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jan 19, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 19, 2016 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 3, 2016 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Feb 3, 2016 · Senate
LRB correction
- Feb 3, 2016 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 2-3-2016
- Feb 4, 2016 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 2-4-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 128
- Feb 4, 2016 · Senate
Published 2-5-2016
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote