Senate Bill 351
The Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 11, 2016. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 29, 2015
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 20, 2016
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 9, 2016
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2015 Wisconsin Act 352
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 11, 2016: “Published 4-12-2016”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill incorporates into Wisconsin law the 2002 Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act.
Current law gives domestic violence protection orders issued by another state or an Indian tribe full faith and credit in this state, allowing those orders to be enforced in courts in this state if they meet certain procedural requirements, including ensuring that the court had jurisdiction over the persons involved and the subject matter, and that the person subject to the order was provided with his or her right to due process. Current law establishes a method of filing a foreign protection order with a circuit court and requires the circuit court to send a copy of that order to the county sheriff or local law enforcement agency.
Read the full summary Show less
Additional current law gives law enforcement officers the authority to arrest a person subject to a protection order if the law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe the person has violated a valid foreign protection order. Under current law, court officials, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers are immune from any liability for his or her acts or omissions related to the filing of a foreign protection order or the detention or arrest of an alleged violator of a foreign protection order.
This bill consolidates those separate units of current law and creates additional statutory language to enact the 2002 Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, as adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
The Act defines "protection order" to be an injunction or other order, issued by a tribunal under the domestic violence, family violence, or antistalking laws of the issuing state, to prevent an individual from engaging in violent or threatening acts against, harassment of, contact or communication with, or physical proximity to another individual. The fact that the order has terms and conditions that are different from orders issued in the enforcing state, or come from tribunals that are not organized in the same fashion as the tribunals of the enforcing state, does not mean that the enforcing state may refuse enforcement. Any kind of a foreign order that is intended to prevent violence must be enforced. The term "tribunal," as used in the Act, is consistent with the usage of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, which has been enacted in every U.S. jurisdiction. Whether the enforcing body is a court or an agency, the term tribunal includes both within its scope.
A tribunal with jurisdiction to enforce orders may enforce a foreign protection order without any other prior perfecting or validating procedure. A valid foreign protection order must be enforced. A valid protection order is one that identifies the protected individual (the potential victim) and the respondent (the potential victimizer), is currently in effect, and was issued by a tribunal with full jurisdiction.
An order valid on its face establishes a prima facie case for its validity. The presence of an order that identifies the protected individual and the respondent that is current constitutes probable cause to believe that a valid foreign protection order exists. Law enforcement officers who are not presented with an actual order may still act to enforce upon other information that provides probable cause to believe that a valid order exists.
Who's behind it
10 senators are its . 7 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.
10 more lawmakers .
See all 20 names Hide the names
Authors (10)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (10)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Jill Billings · Democrat, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Robb Kahl · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Spreitzer · Democrat, Senate
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 0 · Jan 14, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 11, 2016
The new law was published.
-
Apr 11, 2016
The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 352.
-
Apr 7, 2016
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 9, 2016
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jan 25, 2016
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 21, 2016
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 20, 2016
The Senate passed it.
-
Jan 14, 2016
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 0.
-
Jan 7, 2016
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 29, 2015
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.
-
Oct 29, 2015
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 29, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Risser, Wanggaard, Miller, Olsen, L. Taylor, Ringhand, Cowles, Lassa, Carpenter and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Jacque, Kahl, Ballweg, Subeck, Jorgensen, A. Ott, Sinicki, Billings, Johnson and Spreitzer
- Oct 29, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Jan 7, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 13, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 0
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 19, 2016 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-20-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 21, 2016 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 25, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 10, 2016 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 17, 2016 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 7, 2016 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-8-2016
- Apr 11, 2016 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-11-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 352
- Apr 11, 2016 · Senate
Published 4-12-2016
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote