Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Senate Bill 360

Modifying and repealing various rules promulgated by the Department of Transportation. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 25, 2016. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 29, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 9, 2016

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 18, 2016

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 25, 2016.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2016: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes minor and technical changes to rules promulgated by the Department of Transportation (DOT), including correcting obsolete references and references to defunct programs and updating or repealing provisions that are inconsistent with current statutes and federal rules or that were promulgated based on statutes that have since been amended or repealed. The bill also make several substantive changes to various rules promulgated by DOT, including the following:

1. DOT's current rules include provisions implementing the Wisconsin Environmental Policy Act. These rules include provisions that, among other things, establish criteria and procedures relating to environmental assessments, environmental impact statements, environmental reports, and categorical exclusions relating to DOT actions that may affect the quality of the human environment. Many of these rules reference provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. This bill makes various changes to rules relating to the environmental review process and environmental documentation for transportation projects, including 1) removing examples of specific actions for which an environmental assessment or environmental report is or is not required; 2) standardizing and clarifying content requirements for certain environmental documentation; 3) modifying certain provisions relating to notice and hearing on proposed actions; 4) adding provisions relating to revision of final action documents, including environmental reports and records of decision; 5) modernizing references to federal law; and 6) eliminating or adding notes and making other minor and technical changes.

Read the full summary

2. The bill changes the methodology by which the department evaluates major highway projects.

3. The bill allows certain recreational vehicle dealers that do not have a permanent facility in the state to display and sell recreational vehicles at certain temporary rally or show sites.

4. The bill authorizes an alternate design for handicapped parking signs displayed in parking lots.

5. The bill eliminates a continuity-of-service requirement for motor vehicle rental companies.

6. The bill authorizes the use of electronic signatures on applications for special identification cards that afford certain parking privileges for persons with a disability that limits or impairs the ability to walk.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 15, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 15, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 15, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2016

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 25, 2016

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 21, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 18, 2016

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 12, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 9, 2016

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 9, 2016

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 9, 2016

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Jan 15, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Jan 15, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Jan 15, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Jan 7, 2016

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Nov 18, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Oct 29, 2015

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs.

  15. Oct 29, 2015

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 29, 2015 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Petrowski and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Ripp, Ballweg, Weatherston and Murphy

  2. Oct 29, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs

  3. Nov 18, 2015 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 7, 2015 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski

  5. Jan 7, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 11, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Petrowski

  7. Jan 14, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 15, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Jan 15, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Jan 15, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Jan 15, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  16. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  18. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  19. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  21. Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  22. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 2:23 PM on 2-18-2016 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  23. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Feb 18, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  29. Feb 25, 2016 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  30. Apr 21, 2016 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-21-2016

  31. Apr 25, 2016 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-25-2016

  32. May 17, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2016 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  33. May 17, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote