Senate Bill 390
Lines transporting manure within highway rights-of-way and providing a penalty. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 2, 2016. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 12, 2015
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 20, 2016
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 9, 2016
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2015 Wisconsin Act 231
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 2, 2016: “Published 3-2-2016”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill specifies the process for authorizing pipelines or hoses transmitting liquid manure within or across a highway right-of-way.
Under current law, no person may excavate, fill, install a culvert in, or otherwise alter or disturb any highway without a permit (often referred to as a driveway permit) from the authority maintaining the highway (highway authority).
Read the full summary Show less
Current law also requires written consent (often referred to as a utility permit) of the highway authority before utility lines or pipes, including water pipes, are constructed within or across the limits of a highway.
Also under current law, upon application, if certain conditions are satisfied, the governing body of a municipality may grant a "privilege" to place an obstruction or excavation within a highway in a municipality. A privilege is not required to be granted for an obstruction or excavation that is in place for less than 90 days and for which a permit has been granted.
Under this bill, a utility permit, issued by the applicable highway authority, is required to construct a subterranean pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure within or across a highway right-of-way. A utility permit, issued by the Department of Transportation, is also required if the pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure is not subterranean but crosses or lies within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway. A utility permit may be obtained, but is not required, for a pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure that is not subterranean and does not cross or lie within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway; however, if a utility permit is not obtained, a driveway permit from the local highway authority is required.
Under this bill, for purposes of a driveway permit, a manure hose is defined as a hose, pipeline, or other conduit, whether temporary or permanent, for the transmission of liquid manure within or across a highway right-of-way to a destination for spreading in a farm field or for storage. The bill specifies that a driveway permit authorizing the permittee to lay out or install any manure hose within or across a highway right-of-way may also authorize the permittee to temporarily affix to a bridge under the jurisdiction of the highway authority hooks, flanges, fasteners, or other devices to or by which a manure hose may be attached or supported. The highway authority may require the driveway permit applicant to submit, for approval, a plan specifying how the manure hose would be attached to or supported by the bridge. The driveway permit may impose reasonable conditions related to the authorization provided under the permit.
The bill also clarifies that, if a utility permit is issued for a pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure, a driveway permit is not required and, if either a utility permit or driveway permit is issued, a privilege granted by a municipality is not required. The bill further specifies that a driveway permit may not be issued for a subterranean pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure within or across a highway right-of-way or for a pipe or pipeline transmitting liquid manure within or across the right-of-way of a state trunk highway.
Under current law, if a highway authority issues a driveway permit, the permit must contain the statement and be subject to the condition that the work must be constructed subject to rules and regulations prescribed by the highway authority and be performed and completed to its satisfaction, that for temporary alterations the highway be restored to its former condition, and that the permittee be liable for damages which occur during the progress of, or as a result of, the work. If work for which a permit is required is performed without a permit, or if a permit is issued and there is any violation of the foregoing with respect to the permit, the highway authority may restore the highway to its former condition and the violator is subject to a criminal penalty of a fine of not less than $5 nor more than $100 or imprisonment not exceeding six months or both.
This bill increases this penalty to a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $500 and specifies that, if the highway authority restores the highway to its former condition in connection with a violation, the restoration is done at the violator's expense.
Current law allows an applicant for a utility permit, whose application to construct "lines" within a highway right-of-way has been refused, to appeal to the Division of Hearings and Appeals in the Department of Administration.
This bill specifies that this appeal right also applies with respect to applications to construct pipes or pipelines.
Who's behind it
8 senators are its . 6 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.
21 more lawmakers .
See all 29 names Hide the names
Authors (8)
- Richard Gudex · Republican, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Terry Moulton · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (21)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Allen · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Adam Jarchow · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Jesse Kremer · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Loudenbeck · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Lee Nerison · Republican, Assembly
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- Romaine Quinn · Republican, Senate
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 15, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 15, 2016
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 2, 2016
The new law was published.
-
Mar 2, 2016
The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 231.
-
Feb 25, 2016
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 9, 2016
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jan 25, 2016
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 21, 2016
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 20, 2016
The Senate passed it.
-
Jan 20, 2016
The Senate adopted it.
-
Jan 19, 2016
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 15, 2016
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Jan 15, 2016
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 7, 2016
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 12, 2015
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs.
-
Nov 12, 2015
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 12, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Petrowski, Gudex, Harsdorf, Lassa, Marklein, Moulton, Stroebel and Vinehout; cosponsored by Representatives Edming, Tranel, Allen, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Czaja, Jacque, Jarchow, Kitchens, Kremer, Krug, Kulp, T. Larson, Loudenbeck, Mursau, Nerison, A. Ott, Petryk, Quinn, Ripp and Tittl
- Nov 12, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs
- Dec 3, 2015 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Jan 7, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 15, 2016 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2016 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 19, 2016 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 19, 2016 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-20-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 21, 2016 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 25, 2016 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 4, 2016 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 10, 2016 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 17, 2016 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Feb 25, 2016 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 2-25-2016
- Mar 2, 2016 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-1-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 231
- Mar 2, 2016 · Senate
Published 3-2-2016
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote