Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: operation of off-highway motorcycles, granting rule-making authority, making appropriations, and providing penalties. (FE)
Governor — Appointments Motorcycle Municipality Natural resources, department of — Recreation and boating Recreation vehicle
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers
the laws regulating the operation and registration of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and
utility terrain vehicles (UTVs). This bill establishes requirements for the operation
and registration of off-highway motorcycles (OHMs) that are similar to the
requirements that apply under current law to ATVs and UTVs. The bill defines an
OHM as a motorcycle that is designed for off-highway operation, regardless of
whether it is also designed for on-highway operation.
This bill requires DNR to develop, encourage, and supervise a system of OHM
trails and routes in a similar manner to that existing under current law for ATV and
UTV trails and routes. The bill defines an "OHM trail" to be a corridor on lands open
to the public for recreational OHM use. The bill defines an "OHM route" to be a
highway or sidewalk open to recreational OHM use. The bill allows DNR to establish
standards and procedures for certifying the designation of OHM trails. As under
current law applicable to ATV trails, this bill allows a county, city, village, or town
(local governmental unit) or DNR to designate OHM routes and corridors through
land that it owns or controls for use as OHM trails. Moneys for these OHM projects
undertaken by DNR or local governmental units under this system, for enforcement
of OHM laws, and for the safety grants as described below, are appropriated from the
general fund. In providing funding for these projects, DNR must give priority to
trails, routes, and other facilities that are open only for use by OHMs.
OHM registration and trail passes
This bill distinguishes OHMs that are registered by the Department of
Transportation (DOT) from those that are not. The bill does not restrict the owner
of an OHM from registering the OHM with DOT for highway use. However, if an
owner wishes to operate an OHM off the highway, the owner must register the OHM
with DNR and pay an annual registration fee. As to operation on OHM routes, the
owner must register the OHM with DNR unless the OHM route is on a highway, as
opposed to a sidewalk, and the OHM is registered with DOT. The owner of an OHM
may register it with DNR for public use on trails and routes and other areas open for
public use. The owner may register an OHM for private use if its use will be limited
to operation for agricultural purposes and operation by the owner or a member of his
or her family on land that is owned or leased by the owner or a family member. The
fee for registration for private use is lower. The bill includes exemptions from this
registration requirement which are similar to those exemptions under current law
for ATVs and UTVs. The bill also requires a person who sells OHMs for a profit at
retail to register with DNR as an OHM dealer. These registration fees are deposited
in the transportation fund.
If a person will be operating an OHM off the highways, and the OHM is not
registered with DNR, or is not exempt from DNR registration, the person must pay
a fee and be issued an annual nonresident trail pass by DNR in order to operate the
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 25, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 25, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 20, 2015 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representatives Mursau, Krug, Ballweg, Czaja, Allen, A. Ott and Weatherston
- Nov 20, 2015 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs
- Dec 3, 2015 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 20, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Jan 21, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 25, 2016 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 25, 2016 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 25, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1