Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Senate Bill 434

Taxes on managed forest lands, eligibility for the managed forest land program, management plans for managed forest land, sale or transfer of managed forest land, productivity of managed forest land, closed managed forest land, forest production areas, natural heritage inventory, wildlife action plans, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 14, 2016. It's ⁠. Before signing, the governor struck some parts using Wisconsin's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 7, 2015

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 9, 2016

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 62 to 32

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 358

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2016: “Failed to pass partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

How the partial veto works

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes numerous changes to the managed forest land (MFL) program administered by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

Introduction Under current law, certain forested land may be designated as MFL under a program administered by DNR. Under this program, the owner of land designated as MFL makes an annual acreage share payment that is lower than, and in lieu of, the property taxes that normally would be payable. In exchange, the owner must comply with certain forestry practices and have a management plan prepared for the land. The owner must also open the MFL to the public for hunting, fishing, hiking, sight-seeing, and cross-country skiing, but may designate up to a certain number of acres as being closed to the public. For MFL that is designated as closed, the owner must pay an additional closed acreage fee. An owner seeking to have land designated as MFL submits an application to DNR that contains a management plan for the land. If the MFL meets the eligibility requirements under the program, which include minimum acreage requirements and requirements as to how much merchantable timber can be produced on the land, DNR approves the application and issues an order designating the land as MFL. An owner may choose to have the order last 25 or 50 years.

Read the full summary

A similar program exists for land designated as forest croplands (FCL). Since July 1985, no new land may be subject to the FCL program. However, there is forest land that is currently in this program since the designations last for 25 or 50 years.

Taxes and fees Under current law, an owner pays a severance tax for wood products removed from FCL and a yield tax for merchantable timber cut from MFL. This bill eliminates both taxes.

Under current law, subject to limitations, land may be withdrawn from the MFL program with payment of a withdrawal tax. The withdrawal tax is the higher of two amounts: the amount of past tax liability, less the taxes paid, or 5 percent of the fair market value of the merchantable timber on the land, less the taxes paid.

Variations on this method of calculating the withdrawal taxes are used depending on when the land was designated as MFL, how long the land has been designated as MFL, and whether the MFL is subject to an original order or an order that has been renewed. Under this bill, those methods are replaced with a single method of calculating this tax: the total net property tax rate imposed by the municipality in which the land is located is multiplied by the assessed value of the land being withdrawn, with the result then multiplied by ten years, or the number of years the MFL was subject to the order, whichever is fewer.

Under current law, the amount that is collected as closed acreage fees is collected by the applicable taxation district and paid to the applicable county, which pays these amounts to DNR for deposit into the conservation fund. This bill requires the taxation district to retain 80 percent of the closed acreage fees and to pay 20 percent of the closed acreage fees to the county. None of the amount collected is paid to DNR.

Eligible land Under current law, a parcel of land is eligible for designation as MFL only if it consists of at least ten contiguous acres. Under this bill, the minimum acreage requirement is increased to 20 acres, but the owner of an MFL parcel of less than 20 acres may apply for a one-time renewal of the order designating the parcel as MFL without meeting the 20-acre requirement.

Under current law, a parcel that is developed for a human residence is not eligible for designation as MFL. Under the bill, a parcel is not eligible if there is any building or improvement associated with a building located on the parcel. The bill defines "building" to include any structure used as shelter, as a place of employment, or as storage and "improvement" to include any accessory building, structure, or fixture that is placed on a parcel for the parcel's benefit. The bill specifically excludes roads, certain rights-of-way, fences, hunting blinds, and other structures from being considered improvements. This bill requires DNR to promulgate rules relating to hunting blinds and authorizes emergency rule making.

Under current law, the owner of land that is designated as managed forest land under an order that takes effect on or after April 28, 2004, may file an application with DNR to designate as managed forest land an additional parcel of land if the additional parcel is at least three acres in size and is contiguous to any of that designated land. This bill allows any owner of MFL to apply to designate an additional parcel of land as MFL regardless of the date of the order designating the land as MFL. The tax rate applicable to an added parcel is the tax rate currently applicable to the parcel to which the land is being added.

Management plans Under current law, an amendment to or repeal of the MFL subchapter of the statutes does not affect the terms of an order or management plan, except as expressly agreed to in writing by the land owner and DNR. Under this bill, subject to certain exceptions, DNR may not amend or otherwise change the terms of an order or management plan to conform with changes made to the statutes subsequent to the date on which the order was entered or the plan was approved. If a statute is enacted or a rule is promulgated during the period of the order that materially changes the terms of the order, the state shall require the landowner to elect between acceptance of modifications to the contract or voluntary withdrawal of the land without penalty.

Under current law, an MFL order may be renewed at the end of its term. DNR may deny an application for renewal only if the land does not comply with the eligibility requirements, the owner has failed to comply with the management plan for the MFL, or delinquent taxes are owed on the land. Under this bill, DNR may deny the application if the land that is subject to the renewal application is not identical to the MFL under the existing order or if certain requirements for establishing, updating, and reviewing mandatory forestry soil and conservation practices in a management plan are not met.

Sales and transfers of land Under current law, an owner may sell or transfer an entire parcel of MFL. An owner may also sell or transfer part of a parcel of MFL, if the land being sold or transferred is all of the owner's land located in a quarter-quarter section or in a government lot or fractional lot, provided that the land remaining meets the eligibility requirements for designation as MFL. Under the bill, an owner may voluntarily withdraw part of an MFL parcel for the purpose of selling it or using it as a construction site. The land withdrawn may not be less than one acre and may not be more than five acres. The bill limits the number of times that MFL may be withdrawn for this purpose and requires the owner to pay the withdrawal taxes and the withdrawal fee.

Productivity of land This bill creates a provision that allows an owner of MFL that has been damaged by a natural disaster to restore the productivity of the land so that it meets the requirements under the MFL program for producing merchantable timber. If the owner fails to complete the restoration within a time period specified by DNR, either DNR may order withdrawal of the land or the owner of the land may request withdrawal of the land. The owner is exempt from payment of withdrawal taxes if the owner makes the request and DNR determines that the MFL is unable to meet the production requirements for merchantable timber and if the owner withdraws only the number of acres necessary for the parcel to again meet the production requirements. This bill defines "natural disaster" as fire, ice, snow, wind, flooding, insects, drought, or disease.

This bill also allows an owner who is unable to meet the requirements for producing merchantable timber for environmental, ecological, or economic reasons to request withdrawal of that part of a parcel that is unsuitable for the production of merchantable timber. The owner is exempt from payment of withdrawal taxes or fees.

Under current law, a person may not cut any merchantable wood products on FCL or any merchantable timber on MFL unless the owner has filed a notice with DNR. DNR may prescribe the amount of forest products or timber to be removed unless the notice of intention to cut was provided to DNR by a cooperating forester authorized to assist in the harvesting and sale of timber or by an accredited forester.

Under this bill, DNR may not prescribe the amount of forest products or timber to be removed if the notice of intention to cut was provided to DNR by additional persons meeting specified education and work experience requirements.

Closed lands Under current law, an owner may designate MFL as closed to public access. The closed area may consist of a quarter-quarter section, a government lot, a fractional lot, or a combination thereof or up to 160 acres in each municipality. Under this bill, an owner may designate any MFL as closed to public access, and the limit on acreage that can be designated as closed applies only to land owned by a business entity.

This bill also allows an owner of land designated as closed to permit a person who performs land management activities on the land to access the land to conduct recreational activities.

Other provisions Under current law, a "forest production area" is an area in a state forest that DNR has classified as an area in which the primary management objective relates to the production of timber and other forest products. This bill requires DNR to propose a variance to the master plans of all state forests except for the southern state forests and Governor Knowles State Forest so that 75 percent of all the land in those state forests combined is classified as a forest production area.

Under current law, DNR conducts a natural heritage inventory program to determine the existence and degree of endangerment of natural areas. Under this bill, activities under the program related to private property may be conducted only with the permission of the property owner.

This bill authorizes DNR to prepare a state wildlife action plan that identifies which native wildlife species with low or declining populations are most at risk and that provides guidance for activities to conserve those species. The plan may not require action by property owners or the department and may not be referenced as guidance on DNR forms.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

10 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (10)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 16 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Sporting Heritage vote on an amendment

Passed, 4 to 1 · Jan 14, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Sporting Heritage vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 14, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 16 to 0 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 4 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 3 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 3 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 3 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 3 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 3 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 3 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 19 to 13 · Feb 9, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 20 to 11 · Feb 9, 2016 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 11”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 62 to 32 · Feb 18, 2016 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (62)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 62, Noes 32, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 34 · Feb 18, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 62 to 33 · Feb 18, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 33”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2016

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. May 17, 2016

    “Partial veto placed on calendar 5-17-2016 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)” (the official wording)

  3. Apr 14, 2016

    The new law was published.

  4. Apr 14, 2016

    The governor signed it after striking some parts with a partial veto. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 358.

  5. Apr 13, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  6. Feb 18, 2016

    The Assembly passed it too, 62 to 32.

  7. Feb 12, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Feb 9, 2016

    The Assembly received it.

  9. Feb 9, 2016

    The Senate passed it, 20 to 11.

  10. Feb 9, 2016

    The Senate adopted it.

  11. Feb 9, 2016

    “Placed on the foot of the 11th order of business on the calendar of 2-9-2016” (the official wording)

  12. Feb 8, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 3.

  13. Feb 8, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  14. Feb 8, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  15. Feb 8, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  16. Feb 8, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  17. Feb 8, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  18. Feb 8, 2016

    “Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  19. Feb 8, 2016

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 4 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  20. Feb 8, 2016

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  21. Feb 2, 2016

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  22. Jan 14, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  23. Jan 14, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 4, Noes 1” (the official wording)

  24. Jan 8, 2016

    5 more representatives signed on in support.

  25. Jan 6, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  26. Dec 18, 2015

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  27. Dec 9, 2015

    The committee held a public hearing.

  28. Dec 7, 2015

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry.

  29. Dec 7, 2015

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 7, 2015 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Tiffany and Moulton; cosponsored by Representatives Mursau, T. Larson, E. Brooks, Swearingen and Czaja

  2. Dec 7, 2015 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry

  3. Dec 9, 2015 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Dec 18, 2015 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 6, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 8, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Quinn added as a cosponsor

  7. Jan 8, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Edming added as a cosponsor

  8. Jan 8, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Jarchow added as a cosponsor

  9. Jan 8, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor

  10. Jan 8, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Ripp added as a cosponsor

  11. Jan 12, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tiffany

  12. Jan 14, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  13. Jan 14, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  14. Jan 14, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  15. Jan 14, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  16. Jan 19, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tiffany

  17. Jan 21, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Tiffany

  18. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator Tiffany

  19. Feb 2, 2016 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and rereferred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)

  20. Feb 4, 2016 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 3)

  21. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  22. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 4 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  23. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  24. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  25. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  26. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  27. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  28. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  29. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  30. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  31. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  32. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Bewley

  33. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 5 offered by Senators Vinehout, Miller, Erpenbach, L. Taylor, Risser, Lassa, Hansen, Wirch, Carpenter, Ringhand and Bewley

  34. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  35. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on the foot of the 11th order of business on the calendar of 2-9-2016

  36. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table

  37. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  38. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Vinehout, Miller, Erpenbach, L. Taylor, Risser, Lassa, Hansen, Wirch, Carpenter, Ringhand and Bewley

  39. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 13

  40. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  41. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  42. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 11

  43. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  44. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  45. Feb 12, 2016 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  46. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 2:26 PM on 2-18-2016 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  47. Feb 17, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Milroy

  48. Feb 17, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Milroy

  49. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  50. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 34

  51. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 33

  52. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  53. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  54. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 62, Noes 32, Paired 2

  55. Feb 18, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  56. Feb 19, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  57. Mar 2, 2016 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  58. Mar 10, 2016 · Senate

    LRB correction

  59. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-13-2016

  60. Apr 14, 2016 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor with partial veto on 4-14-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 358

  61. Apr 14, 2016 · Senate

    Published 4-15-2016

  62. May 17, 2016 · Senate

    Partial veto placed on calendar 5-17-2016 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  63. May 17, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to pass partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Partial veto

Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Partial veto

Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote