Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: regulation of aquaculture and fish farms. (FE)
Agriculture Fish and fishing — Commercial Housing and economic development authority, wisconsin Interstate compact Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Transportation, department of — Vehicles Water — Pollution Waterways and water power Wetland
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to the regulation of aquaculture and fish farms.
Wetland permits
Under current law, no person may discharge dredged material or fill material
into a wetland unless the discharge is authorized by a wetland general permit or
individual permit issued by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). An
individual permit is issued to a person for a particular discharge that is not covered
under a general permit. A general permit is issued for certain categories of
discharges, including a discharge that is part of a development for agricultural
purposes if the discharge does not affect more than 10,000 square feet of wetland.
This bill adds aquacultural purposes to this category of discharge.
This bill also exempts normal aquaculture activities, if the discharge is to a
wetland that has been created for aquacultural purposes, and the construction or
maintenance of ponds or roads used in fish farms from the requirement to obtain an
individual or general wetland permit.
Current law requires an applicant for an individual wetland permit to submit
to DNR an analysis of the practicable alternatives to the proposed discharge that will
avoid and minimize the discharge's adverse impacts on the wetland and that will not
result in any other significant adverse environmental consequences. The bill creates
an exemption to this requirement if the application is for a permit authorizing a
discharge from a fish farm.
Current law specifies that DNR must require wetland mitigation for each
wetland individual permit that it issues. A person may conduct wetland mitigation
by the use of various methods, including purchasing credits from a mitigation bank
or completing mitigation within the same watershed or within one-half mile of the
site of the discharge. This bill requires DNR to consider wetlands created in the
ordinary course of a fish farm's operation when determining whether the facility has
completed wetland mitigation within the same watershed or within one-half mile of
the site of the discharge.
The bill also provides that, if DNR considers whether proposed activities are
water or wetland dependent when determining whether to issue a wetland
individual permit, DNR must regard a fish farm's activities as water or wetland
dependent.
Natural bodies of water used as fish farms
The bill expands the category of natural bodies of water that may be used as
part of a fish farm to include a spring that provides water to an artificial water body
that is used as a fish farm. Under current law, a natural body of water may be used
as a fish farm or part of a fish farm only if the water body is a freeze-out pond, a
preexisting fish rearing facility, or a body of water for which DNR has issued a
permit. The bill defines "natural body of water" as a spring, stream, pond, lake, or
wetland that was historically present in a natural state but may have been
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 14, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Jan 14, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 4, 2016 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Tiffany and Gudex; cosponsored by Representatives Czaja, Horlacher, Murphy, Jarchow, T. Larson and Brandtjen
- Jan 4, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry
- Jan 5, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 8, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tiffany
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jan 14, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 28, 2016 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 15, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Tiffany
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1