Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: restitution owed to victims of crime.
Corrections, department of Court — Clerk Court — Fee Crime victim Garnishment Revenue, department of
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes changes to the procedures for providing restitution to victims
of crime. Under current law, when a court imposes a sentence on a defendant for the
commission of a crime, the court may order the defendant to make full or partial
restitution to any victim of a crime considered at sentencing (or his or her estate, if
the victim is deceased). A court may require the defendant to pay the amount ordered
immediately, to pay the amount ordered in full by a particular date, or to make
specified payments. Under current law, restitution may be collected from the
defendant by the clerk of courts or, if the defendant is under the supervision of the
Department of Corrections (DOC), by DOC.
If the defendant still owes unpaid restitution at the time he or she has
completed his or her sentence and is no longer supervised by DOC, the victim who
is owed restitution may collect payments by garnishing wages earned by the
defendant. Under current law, a garnishment order lasts for 13 weeks, after which
time it may be renewed for additional 13-week periods until the restitution is paid
in full.
Under current law, DOC may collect from a prisoner a portion of the wages a
prisoner earns and a portion of other moneys held by the prisoner in order to pay
restitution if a court orders DOC to do so. Additionally, under current law, DOC is
required to collect a fee from certain probationers, parolees, and persons on extended
supervision to reimburse DOC partially for its costs in providing supervision and
services (supervision fees). Currently, DOC may certify to the Department of
Revenue (DOR) any amount a person owes toward supervision fees so that DOR may
withhold that amount from any state tax refund the person receives.
This bill allows DOC to charge, but prohibits DOC from collecting, a
reimbursement fee from a probationer, parolee, or person on extended supervision
unless all restitution payments due from the person have been paid by the time the
reimbursement fee is collected. Additionally, the bill requires a court to order a
defendant to authorize DOC to withhold a portion of any wages earned or any other
moneys held by the defendant while he or she is in prison in order to pay restitution.
Under the bill, if restitution remains unpaid and a victim seeks garnishment
of a defendant's wages, any garnishment order remains in place until the restitution
is paid in full. Additionally, under the bill, if a defendant fails to make restitution
payment in full within the time period ordered by the court, or if the defendant is
delinquent in making payments toward restitution as ordered, the clerk of courts or
DOC may certify to DOR the amount of restitution owed, and DOR may withhold
that amount from any state tax refund the defendant receives. The bill also requires
DOC and any clerk of court that collects restitution to submit an annual report to the
legislature that sets forth the amounts of restitution it collects each year.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Darling (R) , Erpenbach (D) , Gudex (R) , Harsdorf (R) , Kapenga (R) , Lasee (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Moulton (R) , Olsen (R) , Roth (R) , Shilling (D) , Vukmir (R) , Wanggaard (R)
27 cosponsors
Ballweg (R) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Czaja (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Goyke (D) , Heaton (R) , Horlacher (R) , Hutton (R) , Jarchow (R) , Johnson (D) , Kahl (D) , Kleefisch (R) , Knodl (R) , Kooyenga (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Lassa (D) , Milroy (D) , Murphy (R) , Novak (R) , Nygren (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Schraa (R) , Shankland (D) , Skowronski (R) , Subeck (D) , Thiesfeldt (R)
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 1, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 6, 2016 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Olsen, Wanggaard, Darling, Erpenbach, Gudex, Harsdorf, Kapenga, Lasee, LeMahieu, Moulton, Roth, Shilling and Vukmir; cosponsored by Representatives Hutton, Kleefisch, Ballweg, E. Brooks, Brostoff, Czaja, Goyke, Horlacher, Jarchow, Johnson, Kahl, Knodl, Kooyenga, Murphy, Novak, Nygren, Schraa, Shankland, Skowronski, C. Taylor, Thiesfeldt and Ohnstad
- Jan 6, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Jan 7, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 7, 2016 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a coauthor
- Jan 8, 2016 · Senate
Senator L. Taylor added as a coauthor
- Jan 8, 2016 · Senate
Representative Heaton added as a cosponsor
- Jan 13, 2016 · Senate
Representative Milroy added as a cosponsor
- Feb 1, 2016 · Senate
Representative Subeck added as a cosponsor
- Feb 1, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 1, 2016 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 1, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 8, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Olsen
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1