Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: suspending, revoking, or refusing to renew cigarette and tobacco products retailer licenses. (FE)
Cigarette Circuit court Municipality Retail establishment Tobacco
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill allows a municipality that has issued a cigarette or tobacco products
retailer license to suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the license under certain
circumstances, and establishes a procedure for doing so.
Under current law, local municipalities issue licenses to retailers to sell
cigarettes or tobacco products. Current law provides that a license is valid for one
year unless sooner revoked. Under current law, a retailer's license is terminated
upon conviction of its second or subsequent violation of selling cigarettes or tobacco
products without a license, if the retailer is found guilty of failing to exercise due care.
Current law also provides that a court must suspend a retailer's license if the court
finds the retailer guilty of two or more violations of certain restrictions relating to
sales to minors within a 12-month period.
This bill allows a municipality to suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a cigarette
and tobacco products retailer license if the retailer does any of the following: 1)
violates certain restrictions relating to the sale of cigarettes and tobacco; 2) keeps
premises that are disorderly, riotous, indecent, or improper; 3) has failed to maintain
the premises according to sanitation standards; 4) has permitted known criminals
or prostitutes to loiter on the premises; 5) has been convicted of manufacturing,
distributing, or delivering, or possessing with the intent to manufacture, distribute,
or deliver, a controlled substance; or 6) knowingly allows another person on the
licensed premises to manufacture, distribute, or deliver, or possess with the intent
to manufacture, distribute, or deliver, a controlled substance.
Under the bill, a resident or authorized employee of the municipality that
issued the retailer license may file a sworn complaint with the municipal clerk,
alleging one of these grounds for suspension, revocation, or nonrenewal. The person
holding the retailer license is then entitled to a hearing before the municipal
governing body. The municipal governing body must find the allegations of the
complaint to be true and find that there are sufficient grounds for suspension,
revocation, or nonrenewal before suspending, revoking, or refusing to renew the
license. If a retailer's license is revoked following a hearing, the retailer may not
obtain another such license for 12 months. The municipal governing body's decision
to suspend, revoke, or not renew a license, or its decision not to act, may be reviewed
by the circuit court for the county in which the license was issued.
Under current law, it is a defense to any prosecution for selling cigarettes or
tobacco products to a minor if the retailer can show that the purchaser falsely
represented that he or she was at least 18 years of age, presented an identification
card, and appeared to be at least 18, and that the sale was made in good faith. The
bill provides that this is also a defense to a complaint, made under the procedures
described in this bill, that alleges the retailer sold cigarettes or tobacco products to
a minor.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Darling (R) , Harris Dodd (D) , Kapenga (R)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 5, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Elections and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 5, 2016 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 8, 2016 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Darling, Harris Dodd, Carpenter and Kapenga; cosponsored by Representatives Goyke, J. Ott, Jacque, Skowronski, Macco, Rodriguez, Zepnick, Brostoff, Sinicki, Johnson, Kahl, Ohnstad, Riemer, Wachs, Barnes, Bowen and Hutton
- Jan 8, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections and Local Government
- Jan 13, 2016 · Senate
Representative Genrich added as a cosponsor
- Jan 15, 2016 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling
- Jan 25, 2016 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 26, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 3, 2016 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 5, 2016 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2016 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Elections and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2016 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1