Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Senate Bill 567

The review of water quality standards and variances to water quality standards by the Department of Natural Resources and exempting certain actions of the Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Administration from the requirement to promulgate rules relating to the statewide water quality variance for phosphorus. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 2, 2016. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 13, 2016

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 9, 2016

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2016

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 205

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 2, 2016: “Published 3-2-2016”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the Department of Natural Resources to conduct regular reviews of water quality standards and variances to water quality standards.

Background Under current law, DNR must promulgate water quality standards for the waters of the state and effluent limitations for point sources of water pollution. DNR may approve a temporary variance from applicable water quality standards and effluent limitations in a Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) permit issued to a point source.

Read the full summary

Current law also creates a statewide variance for phosphorous water quality standards. An existing point source may request to have the statewide phosphorous variance apply to that source under the source's WPDES permit. Current law sets the interim effluent limitations that apply to a point source for which the statewide phosphorus variance has been approved. Before the statewide phosphorus variance may be made available for any point source, the Department of Administration must determine that complying with the applicable phosphorous effluent limitations is not feasible, and the federal Environmental Protection Agency must approve the statewide phosphorus variance.

Three-year review of water quality standards and variances This bill requires DNR to review, every three years, the water quality standards that it has promulgated to determine whether the standards should be modified or new standards should be adopted. As part of this review, DNR must also review the variances to water quality standards that it has approved, including approvals under the statewide phosphorus variance. If DNR determines that a water quality standard to which a variance applies is attainable by a permittee, DNR is required to modify the variance when the source's permit is reissued or modified.

The bill requires DNR to hold a public hearing as part of this review, and to submit the results of its review to the EPA.

Five-year review of statewide phosphorus variance This bill also requires DNR to review, every five years, the interim effluent limitations under the statewide phosphorus variance to determine whether they are consistent with the highest attainable condition for the point sources that are eligible for the statewide phosphorus variance. DNR must hold a public hearing as part of this review and submit the results of its review to the EPA within 30 days of determining that the review is complete. If DNR does not conduct this review every five years or does not submit the results of a review within 30 days, the statewide phosphorus variance is unavailable until the review is completed or the results are submitted, except that if the statewide phosphorus variance has been approved for a point source, the variance continues to apply to that source until the source's permit is reissued or modified.

If the statewide phosphorus variance has been approved for a point source, the bill also requires DNR to review, at the time the variance is initially approved for the source and each time the source's permit is reissued or modified, the applicable interim effluent limitations to determine whether the they are consistent with the highest attainable condition for the source.

Under the bill, if DNR determines that the applicable interim effluent limitations are not consistent with the highest attainable condition for a permittee or for point sources that are eligible for the statewide phosphorus variance, DNR must include the effluent limitations that were identified as being consistent with the highest attainable condition in any permit that is issued or modified after the date of that determination.

Who's behind it

Rob Cowles, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 8, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 2, 2016

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 2, 2016

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 205.

  3. Feb 25, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 16, 2016

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 11, 2016

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 9, 2016

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 9, 2016

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 8, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  9. Feb 3, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Jan 19, 2016

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Jan 13, 2016

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy.

  12. Jan 13, 2016

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 13, 2016 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Cowles; cosponsored by Representative Loudenbeck

  2. Jan 13, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy

  3. Jan 19, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 3, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 3, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-9-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 9, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  16. Feb 11, 2016 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 by Committee on Rules

  17. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  21. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Feb 17, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  23. Feb 25, 2016 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  24. Feb 25, 2016 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 2-25-2016

  25. Mar 2, 2016 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-1-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 205

  26. Mar 2, 2016 · Senate

    Published 3-2-2016

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote