Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: elimination of the requirement that the governor approve a proposed rule that is considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the Department of Natural Resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin Conservation Congress and limitation of the scope of the requirements that an economic impact analysis and statement of scope be prepared for such a proposed rule. (FE)
Administrative rules Conservation congress Governor Governor — Appointments Natural resources board Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to the rule-making process with respect to
proposed administrative rules considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife
rule hearing of the Department of Natural Resources and county meeting of the
Wisconsin Conservation Congress (spring DNR-WCC meeting).
Gubernatorial approval and statements of scope for proposed rules
Current law requires a statement of scope of a proposed rule to be approved by
the governor and the individual or body that has policy-making powers for a state
agency before a state employee or official may perform any activity in connection
with the drafting of the proposed rule. Under this bill, for rules that are considered
at the spring DNR-WCC meeting, only the Natural Resources Board (board) is
required to approve a statement of scope before those activities may be performed.
Under current law, a state agency must prepare and obtain approval of a
revised statement of scope if, after a statement of scope is approved, the agency
changes the scope of the proposed rule in any meaningful or measurable way. Under
the bill, this requirement does not apply to rules that are considered at the spring
DNR-WCC meeting.
Under current law, a state agency must prepare and obtain approval of a
statement of scope for a proposed emergency rule in the same manner as a statement
of scope is prepared and approved for a nonemergency rule. Under the bill, a
statement of scope is not required for emergency rules considered at the spring
DNR-WCC meeting.
Current law requires a state agency to submit a proposed rule in final draft form
to the governor for approval before the rule may be submitted to the legislature for
review and to submit a proposed emergency rule in final draft form to the governor
for approval before the emergency rule may be filed with the Legislative Reference
Bureau for publication. The bill eliminates these requirements for gubernatorial
approval for rules that are considered at the spring DNR-WCC meeting.
Finally, the bill permits automatic approval of a statement of scope for rules
that are considered at the spring DNR-WCC meeting if the board does not
disapprove the statement of scope within 30 days after it is presented to the board,
or by the eleventh day after its publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register,
whichever is later.
Economic impact analyses for proposed rules
When report must be prepared.
Current law requires each state agency to
prepare an economic impact analysis for all rules proposed by the agency. It also
requires the Department of Administration to issue a report on a proposed rule, and
the secretary of administration (secretary) to approve a proposed rule, if the
economic impact analysis indicates that a total of $20,000,000 or more in
implementation and compliance costs are reasonably expected to be incurred by or
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Jan 22, 2016 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Vinehout, Shilling, Ringhand and Lassa; cosponsored by Representatives Danou, Berceau, Bowen, Considine, Doyle, Hintz, Jorgensen, Kolste, Spreitzer, Subeck and Wachs
- Jan 22, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining, and Forestry
- Feb 24, 2016 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1