Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Senate Bill 618

The crime of child sex trafficking, the inclusion of child sex trafficking in the definition of child abuse, the investigation of a child abuse report in which a person who is not a caregiver of the child is suspected of permitting, allowing, or encouraging the child to engage in prostitution or of child sex trafficking for purposes of a commercial sex act, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 19, 2016. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 22, 2016

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2016

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2016

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2015 Wisconsin Act 367

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 19, 2016: “Published 4-20-2016”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill expands what constitutes the crime of child sex trafficking, includes child sex trafficking under the definition of abuse in the Children's Code, requires the reporting and investigation of certain suspected child abuse cases involving prostitution or child sex trafficking, and makes changes to the information required to be in a court order or provided to a care provider when a child is placed outside the home.

Under current law, a person is guilty of child sex trafficking if he or she knowingly recruits, entices, provides, obtains, or harbors, or knowingly attempts to recruit, entice, provide, obtain, or harbor, any child for the purpose of commercial sex acts. This bill adds transporting or knowingly attempting to transport any child for the purpose of commercial sex acts to this crime.

Read the full summary

Under current law, certain sex crimes committed against a child are included in the definition of "abuse" in the Children's Code. Those sex crimes are first-degree to fourth-degree sexual assault, sexual assault of a child, repeated sexual assault of a child, sexual assault of a child placed in substitute care, sexual exploitation of a child, causing a child to view or listen to sexual activity, and causing a child to expose his or her genitals or exposing one's genitals to a child, and permitting, allowing, or encouraging a child to engage in prostitution.

This bill adds child sex trafficking to the definition of "abuse" in the Children's Code. As such, a child who is the victim of child sex trafficking may be the subject of a child in need of protection or services petition alleging that the child is a victim of abuse.

Under current law, certain persons having reasonable cause to suspect that a child seen in the course of professional duties has been abused must report that suspected abuse to the sheriff or police department or to the county department of human services or social services or, in Milwaukee County, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or a child welfare agency under contract with DCF (collectively "agency"). Current law also permits any other person having reason to suspect that a child has been abused to make such a report.

Current law requires the sheriff or police department to refer to an agency all cases of child abuse reported to it in which a caregiver is suspected of the abuse or of facilitating or failing to take action to prevent the suspected abuse and all cases in which it cannot be determined who abused the child. Then, within 24 hours after receiving the referral, the agency must initiate a diligent investigation to determine if the child is in need of protection or services. Current law, however, permits, rather than requires, the sheriff or police department to refer to an agency a case in which a person who is not a caregiver of a child is suspected of the abuse of the child and permits, rather than requires, the agency to initiate a diligent investigation to determine if the child is in need of protection or services.

This bill requires the sheriff or police department to refer to an agency, and the agency to investigate, a case of child abuse in which a person who is not a caregiver of the child is suspected of permitting, allowing, or encouraging the child to engage in prostitution or of trafficking a child for purposes of a commercial sex act.

Under current law, if the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the Children's Code or Juvenile Justice Code (juvenile court) finds that a child or juvenile is in need of protection or services, the judge must enter an order deciding one or more of the dispositions of the case under a care and treatment plan, including placement and treatment. If the child or juvenile is placed outside the home, the order must include a finding as to whether the agency has made reasonable efforts to prevent the removal of the child or juvenile from the home, while assuring that the health and safety of the child or juvenile are the paramount concerns. However, the juvenile court is not required to include this finding if the juvenile court finds, among other things, that the parent has been convicted of certain crimes, such as homicide or attempted homicide, battery, sexual assault, or physical abuse and that the victim is a child of the parent. This bill includes among these crimes child sex trafficking if the victim is a child of the parent.

Under current law, under the Children's Code and Juvenile Justice Code, when a child is placed in a foster home, group home, or residential care center for children and youth or in the home of a relative other than a parent (substitute care provider), the agency must provide to the substitute care provider certain information contained in the court report or permanency plan. This bill includes information on any involvement of the child, whether as victim or perpetrator, in certain sex crimes if the information is necessary for the care of the child or for the protection of any person under the care of the substitute care provider. In the Children's Code, these sex crimes include sex trafficking and child sex trafficking. This bill adds the same requirement under the Juvenile Justice Code for when a juvenile who has been involved in sex trafficking or child sex trafficking is placed in the care of a substitute care provider.

Who's behind it

10 senators are its ⁠. 7 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

26 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 36 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (26)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 5, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 5, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 5, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 63 to 35 · Feb 16, 2016

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 19, 2016

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 19, 2016

    The governor signed it. It became 2015 Wisconsin Act 367.

  3. Apr 18, 2016

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 16, 2016

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 16, 2016

    “Read” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 16, 2016

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 16, 2016

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 16, 2016

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Feb 15, 2016 to Feb 16, 2016

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  10. Feb 10, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Feb 5, 2016

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  12. Feb 5, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Feb 5, 2016

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  14. Feb 3, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Feb 3, 2016

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  16. Feb 1, 2016

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Jan 28, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Jan 27, 2016

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  19. Jan 22, 2016

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  20. Jan 22, 2016

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 22, 2016 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Olsen, Ringhand, Vinehout, Lasee, Wirch, Harris Dodd, C. Larson, Hansen and Risser; cosponsored by Representatives Loudenbeck, Billings, Johnson, Ballweg, Berceau, Considine, Duchow, Goyke, Jacque, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kolste, Kremer, Kulp, T. Larson, Neylon, Pope, Schraa, Subeck, Tranel, Rohrkaste and Petryk

  2. Jan 22, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Jan 27, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Kahl added as a cosponsor

  4. Jan 28, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 29, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Harsdorf

  6. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Harsdorf

  8. Feb 3, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Wachs added as a cosponsor

  9. Feb 3, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Feb 3, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Feb 3, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Feb 4, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  13. Feb 5, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  14. Feb 5, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  15. Feb 5, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  16. Feb 5, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  17. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  18. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Senator Wanggaard added as a coauthor

  19. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2016 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  20. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a coauthor

  21. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  22. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  24. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  25. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  27. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  28. Feb 16, 2016 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  30. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read

  31. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  32. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  33. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kessler

  34. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 35

  35. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  36. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  37. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  38. Feb 16, 2016 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  39. Feb 17, 2016 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  40. Feb 25, 2016 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  41. Feb 26, 2016 · Senate

    LRB correction

  42. Apr 18, 2016 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-18-2016

  43. Apr 19, 2016 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-19-2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 367

  44. Apr 19, 2016 · Senate

    Published 4-20-2016

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote