Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

SB 654

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: one-call system violations; sulfur dioxide compliance plans; assessment authority of the Public Service Commission; funding for statewide energy efficiency and renewable resource programs; public utility contracts with affiliated interests; local access and transport areas for telephone service; railroad telecommunications service; Department of Natural Resources permit application procedures related to the construction of a high-voltage transmission line; navigable water general permits and individual permits related to utility facilities; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE)

Air pollution Electric utility Energy conservation Forfeiture Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Public service commission Public utility Railroad Telecommunications Telephone

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes changes to certain Department of Natural Resources (DNR)

procedures used on applications for permits related to certain utility facilities. The

bill also makes changes to the enforcement of digger's hotline requirements,

including allowing the Public Service Commission (PSC) to directly assess

forfeitures. The bill also eliminates the PSC's role regarding sulfur dioxide

compliance plans, and makes changes regarding the PSC's assessment authority,

funding for Focus on Energy programs, public utility contracts with affiliated

interests, telecommunications local access and transport area boundaries, and

railroad telecommunications.

DNR permits

This bill allows for an extended deadline for DNR action on an application for

a permit relating to the construction of a high-voltage transmission line. Currently,

a utility that wishes to construct a high-voltage transmission line must submit a

single application to DNR requesting all of the DNR permits that the utility is

required to obtain for the project. DNR must grant or deny the application within

30 days of the date on which the PSC issues a decision on the project. Under this bill,

upon agreement between DNR and the utility, DNR must grant or deny the

application within 45 days after DNR has received all of the information necessary

for it to make that decision regardless of whether the PSC has issued its decision.

This bill prohibits DNR from requiring the relocation of a utility facility as a

condition of a general permit to conduct an activity in navigable waters or as part of

a modification granted for an individual permit if the activity sought to be permitted

is necessary in order to maintain or repair the facility. General permits apply

statewide and authorize certain activities to be conducted in navigable waters as

long as a person notifies DNR of the proposed activity and DNR does not, within 30

days, request additional information or notify the person that an individual permit

will be required.

Digger's hotline enforcement

Current law generally requires owners of transmission facilities, which include

pipes, pipelines, wires, cables, ducts, and associated facilities, to establish or

designate a nonprofit organization to operate a statewide communication system for

receiving excavation notices and transmitting information to transmission facility

owners affected by the notices. Current law requires excavators to provide advance

notice to the system and comply with other requirements regarding excavations.

Transmission facility owners must take certain actions in response to the notices,

including marking their facilities. The statewide communication system is called the

"one-call system," and current law generally requires transmission facility owners

to be members of the system and pay membership fees. The notice and other

requirements are commonly referred to as digger's hotline requirements. Current

law exempts from the requirements transmission facilities on private property that

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Gudex (R) , Marklein (R) , Olsen (R) , Roth (R)

11 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Knodl (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Kulp (R) , Macco (R) , Petersen (R) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Steffen (R) , Tauchen (R)

Votes

Senate: Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

Passed 15–0 Feb 11, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

Passed 12–3 Feb 11, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

Passed 12–3 Feb 11, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

Passed 12–3 Feb 11, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Roth, Olsen, Gudex and Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Kuglitsch, Ballweg, Knodl, Kulp, Macco, A. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Ripp, Steffen and Tauchen

  2. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance

  3. Feb 3, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 5, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Roth

  6. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Roth

  7. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  8. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  10. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  11. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  13. Feb 11, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  14. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1