Skip to content
Bills from the 2015–16 session

Senate Bill 677

Creating a Uniform Collateral Consequences of Conviction Act and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 1, 2016

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2016: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill addresses the issue of collateral consequences to a conviction or finding of delinquency. The bill defines a collateral consequence as a disqualification or a penalty, disability, or disadvantage imposed by operation of law that a person suffers as a result of being convicted of, or found delinquent for, an offense. A collateral consequence does not include imprisonment, probation, imposition of fine, assessment, or forfeiture, or costs of prosecution.

The bill requires the Legislative Reference Bureau and the Legislative Council staff, under the direction of the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties, to identify and create a list of collateral consequences that accrue under state law and administrative rules. Under the bill, a person who is charged with or indicted for an offense must receive information about collateral consequences when he or she is charged or indicted.

Read the full summary

If a person is convicted or adjudicated delinquent, the bill requires the sentencing court to inform the person that collateral consequences may apply as a result of the conviction or adjudication and that there may be ways to obtain relief from the collateral consequences. The bill also requires the court to let the person know when he or she may vote and where he or she may find assistance for relief from collateral consequences from a government or nonprofit agency. Under the bill, if a court fails to provide this information to a person, or if the person does not receive information about collateral consequences when he or she is charged or indicted, that is not grounds to invalidate a plea or a conviction or adjudication of delinquency or grounds for money damages or a claim for relief from any collateral consequence.

Under the bill, a conviction or adjudication of delinquency in another state has the same effect as a conviction or adjudication of delinquency in this state for an offense that has the same elements. A pardon or vacation of a conviction or adjudication of delinquency that occurs in another state has the same effect as a pardon or vacation of a conviction or adjudication of delinquency in this state.

Under the bill, a person who has been convicted of, or adjudicated delinquent for, an offense may petition the sentencing court, at the time of sentencing, or the court for the county in which he or she lives, after sentencing, for an order of limited relief from one or more collateral consequences that relate to the person's employment, education, housing, public benefits, or occupational licensing. If the court hearing the petition determines that granting the petition of relief would materially assist the person in obtaining employment, education, housing, public benefits, or occupational licensing and not put the public at unreasonable risk, the court may order that certain collateral consequences not apply to the person. The court may not relieve a person of his or her duty to register as a sex offender or, if the person is eligible to apply for an occupational driver's license, reinstate driving privileges.

Under the bill, any person may petition the court for the county in which he or she lives for a certificate of restoration of rights relieving collateral consequences after three years have passed since the person's most recent conviction or adjudication of delinquency or three years have passed since the person was released from confinement, whichever occurs later. The bill requires the court to consider several factors, including the person's criminal record and public safety, and allows the court to grant a complete or partial restoration of rights relieving collateral consequences. In addition, the bill requires a court to issue a certificate of restoration of full rights if a person has been pardoned by a governor.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Democrats.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2016

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 26, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Feb 24, 2016

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  4. Feb 17, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Feb 15, 2016

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Feb 1, 2016

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  7. Feb 1, 2016

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators L. Taylor, Harris Dodd and Miller; cosponsored by Representatives Goyke, Ohnstad, Kessler, Pope, Sinicki, Zepnick, Johnson and Barnes

  2. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 17, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 24, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Spreitzer added as a cosponsor

  7. Feb 26, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate