Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

SB 689

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the charge-back of rescinded or refunded property taxes. (FE)

Property tax Revenue, department of

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill requires the Department of Revenue, upon application by a taxation

district, to "charge back," to the taxing jurisdictions within the taxation district,

property taxes that the taxation district rescinded or refunded to taxpayers, so that

each taxing jurisdiction pays back its share of the taxes to the taxation district.

Under the bill, DOR also must determine whether the total value of all taxable

property (equalized value) in the taxation district was affected by the rescinded or

refunded property taxes and, if the equalized value was affected, adjust the

equalized value. Under current law, DOR orders a charge-back or adjustment only

after determining that the taxation district's equalized value was affected, and then

DOR orders either, but not both, of the options.

Under the bill, taxes levied on property within a tax incremental district are not

eligible for a charge-back or adjustment.

The bill applies retroactively to an application submitted by a taxation district

to DOR before the effective date of the bill if DOR has not issued a final

determination, if the final determination is still subject to judicial review, or if DOR

has not certified the amount of the charge-back or adjustment to the taxation

district.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Gudex (R)

2 cosponsors

Hintz (D) , Novak (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 10, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 10, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Gudex; cosponsored by Representatives Novak and Hintz

  2. Feb 1, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues

  3. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Gudex

  4. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 18, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Mar 8, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 10, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Mar 10, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 10, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1