Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

SB 697

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: motor vehicle event data recorders, prohibited insurance practices related to accessing or using information collected by event data recorders, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Insurance — Motor vehicle Motor vehicle — Dealers and finance companies Motor vehicle — Equipment Transportation, department of — Vehicles

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill regulates the use of event data recorders (EDRs) in motor vehicles and

prohibits certain insurance practices on the basis of whether an insured under a

motor vehicle liability insurance policy authorizes the insurer to access or use

information collected by an EDR.

This bill prohibits, with certain exceptions, any person from accessing,

collecting, or transferring information stored on an EDR installed in a motor vehicle

unless the person discloses the intended use of the information and receives the

written consent of an owner of the vehicle. A person who violates the disclosure

requirements or the prohibition on access, collection, or transfer of EDR information

may be required to forfeit not less than $200 nor more than $2,000.

Also under this bill, the Department of Transportation (DOT) must require a

statement as to whether the vehicle is equipped with an EDR to be displayed on any

guide DOT requires to be displayed on used motor vehicles displayed or offered for

sale by a motor vehicle dealer.

The bill prohibits an insurer from conditioning the issuance or renewal of a

motor vehicle liability insurance policy on whether the insured vehicle or vehicle to

be insured is equipped with an EDR or whether, if it is so equipped, the insured or

applicant for insurance authorizes the insurer to access or use information collected

by the EDR. The bill also prohibits an insurer from canceling a motor vehicle liability

insurance policy, excluding or limiting coverage under a motor vehicle liability

insurance policy, or denying a claim under a motor vehicle liability insurance policy,

on the basis of whether the insured vehicle is equipped with an EDR or whether, if

it is so equipped, the insured authorizes the insurer to access or use information

collected by the EDR. The bill makes an exception from these prohibitions for a

usage-based motor vehicle liability insurance policy, which is an insurance policy for

which the premium is based on the active, digital monitoring of how the insured

drives.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: C. Larson (D) , Carpenter (D) , Lasee (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Moulton (R) , Nass (R) , Stroebel (R) , Tiffany (R)

10 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Duchow (R) , Horlacher (R) , Hutton (R) , Kremer (R) , Quinn (R) , Tauchen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tittl (R) , Vinehout (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 10, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 10, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 2, 2016 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Lasee, Nass, Tiffany, LeMahieu, Moulton, Carpenter and C. Larson; cosponsored by Representatives Kremer, Quinn, Horlacher, A. Ott, Thiesfeldt, Duchow, Tauchen and Tittl

  2. Feb 2, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations and Consumer Protection

  3. Feb 2, 2016 · Senate

    Representative Hutton added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 4, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Senator Vinehout added as a coauthor

  6. Feb 8, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Stroebel

  7. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Feb 12, 2016 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Feb 15, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Stroebel

  14. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1