Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session
Relating to: duties of the Public Service Commission under the broadband expansion grant program and certification of political subdivisions under that program. (FE)
Data processing Industrial development Municipality — Planning Ordinance Public service commission
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill imposes certain duties on the Public Service Commission regarding
broadband infrastructure. Current law requires the PSC to designate areas of the
state that are served by fewer than two broadband service providers as underserved
areas and make grants for constructing broadband infrastructure in those areas in
accordance with specified priorities. The bill requires the PSC to encourage the
development of broadband infrastructure in those areas. The bill also requires the
PSC to provide comprehensive information concerning permits required for
broadband network projects and related business activities in the state. In addition,
the PSC must work with other state and local agencies to encourage timely and
efficient issuance of permits and resolution of related issues, as well as encourage
local and federal government agencies to coordinate activities related to approving
applications and issuing permits related to broadband network projects.
The bill imposes additional priorities on the PSC in making the grants
described above. Under the bill, the PSC must give priority to projects that promote
economic development. Also, the PSC must give priority to projects in a city, village,
town, or county (political subdivision) that the PSC has certified as a Broadband
Forward! community. To be eligible for that certification, a political subdivision must
enact an ordinance for reviewing applications and issuing permits related to
broadband network projects. The ordinance must provide for all of the following: a
single point of contact; specified deadlines on the political subdivision's
consideration of applications; specified requirements on the denial and approval of
applications; filing by electronic or another means authorized by the PSC; and
reasonable fees. The bill allows the PSC to develop a model ordinance that complies
with the bill's requirements. If a political subdivision enacts an ordinance that is
different from a model ordinance, the bill requires the political subdivision, when
applying for certification, to submit a written statement describing the ordinance
and how it differs from the model ordinance.
The bill requires the PSC to prescribe the form and manner for political
subdivisions to apply for certification. The PSC must also prescribe a process for
public notice and comment on applications for a period of at least 30 days, and the
PSC must consider any public comments before making a certification. However, the
process for public notice and comment does not apply to an application by a political
subdivision that enacts a model ordinance developed by the PSC or submits the
written statement described above.
The bill imposes the following prohibitions on a political subdivision that the
PSC certifies as a Broadband Ready! community: requiring designation of a final
contractor to complete a broadband network project; imposing application fees that
exceed $100; imposing unreasonable fees; imposing moratoriums on applications,
permits, or construction related to broadband network projects; discriminating
among public utilities and certain other entities; requiring applicants to provide any
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Feb 3, 2016 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Marklein, Harsdorf, Roth, Gudex and Tiffany; cosponsored by Representatives Quinn, E. Brooks, Tranel, VanderMeer, Bernier, Kulp, Mursau, Novak, Krug, T. Larson, Nerison, Spiros, Edming, Ripp, Swearingen, Petryk, Czaja, Kitchens, Tauchen, A. Ott and Macco
- Feb 3, 2016 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Public Works, and Military Affairs
- Feb 8, 2016 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein
- Feb 12, 2016 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 1, 2016 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 13, 2016 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1