Skip to content

Bills · 2015-2016 Regular Session

SB 715

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: creating the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act.

Data processing Fiduciaries Uniform legislation

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill adopts the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, as

approved and recommended by the National Conference of Commissioners on

Uniform State Laws in July 2015. The bill provides default provisions related to a

fiduciary's right to access digital assets. Under the bill, a digital asset is an electronic

record in which an individual has a right or interest. Examples of digital assets

include information stored on a computer or other digital device, content uploaded

onto a Web site, text messages, and rights in domain names or rights associated with

online games. A fiduciary is a personal representative, guardian, conservator, agent

under a power of attorney, or trustee.

Terms of service agreement

Under the bill, a terms of service agreement is an agreement that controls the

relationship between a user and a custodian. A custodian is a person that carries,

maintains, processes, receives, or stores a user's digital assets.

This bill does not change or impair the rights of a custodian or a user under a

terms of service agreement to access and use digital assets. Nor does the bill give a

fiduciary any other rights than the rights held by the user for whom the fiduciary acts

or represents.

Three-tiered priority system

This bill creates the following three-tiered system to address contrary

directions regarding disclosure of digital assets to a fiduciary:

1. This bill gives first priority to a direction made by a user in a will, trust, power

of attorney, or other governing instrument.

2. If the user does not provide a direction in a will, trust, power of attorney, or

other governing instrument, the bill gives priority to a direction provided in an online

tool. Under the bill, an online tool is an electronic service provided by the custodian,

separate from the general terms of service, that allows a user to provide directions

relating to disclosure of the user's digital assets to a third person. A designated

recipient is a person chosen by the user using an online tool to administer digital

assets.

3. Finally, if the user does not provide a direction in a will, trust, power of

attorney, or other governing instrument or using an online tool, direction in the terms

of service governing the digital assets apply to the disclosure of the digital assets to

a fiduciary. If the terms of service do not address fiduciary access, the default rules

provided in this bill apply.

The three-tiered system established in this bill deviates from the Revised

UFADAA. Under the Revised UFADAA, a direction given in an online tool is given

the highest priority, followed by a direction given in a will, trust, power of attorney,

or other record. The final tier is same under the bill and the Revised UFADAA.

Disclosure of content of electronic communications

An electronic communication is a specific type of digital asset that is subject to

Sponsors

Introduced by: Miller (D) , Olsen (R) , Risser (D) , Roth (R)

12 cosponsors

Gannon (R) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hutton (R) , Kahl (D) , Kolste (D) , Kremer (R) , Murphy (R) , Pope (D) , R. Brooks (R) , Sargent (D) , Sinicki (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 10, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 10, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 10, 2016 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Roth, Risser, Olsen and Miller; cosponsored by Representatives R. Brooks, Sargent, Kahl, Kremer, Goyke, Gannon, Pope, Kolste, Hutton, Sinicki, Murphy and Genrich

  2. Feb 9, 2016 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues

  3. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Roth

  4. Feb 10, 2016 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Roth

  5. Feb 18, 2016 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Mar 8, 2016 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 10, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Mar 10, 2016 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 10, 2016 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions, and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Mar 10, 2016 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Apr 13, 2016 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1