Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: prohibiting employers from testing employees and prospective employees for the presence of tetrahydrocannabinols, synthetic cannabinoids, or controlled substance analogs of tetrahydrocannabinols or synthetic cannabinoids as a condition of employment. (FE)
Drugs — Criminal acts and law enforcement Employment
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits an employer, including the
state, from requiring an employee or prospective employee to submit to a test for the
presence of any tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which is the active ingredient in
marijuana, synthetic cannabinoid, or controlled substance analog to THC or a
synthetic cannabinoid in his or her system (drug testing) as a condition of
employment. The bill, subject to certain exceptions, provides that any agreement
between an employer and an employee or prospective employee offering employment
or any pay or benefit to an employee or prospective employee in return for the
employee or prospective employee submitting to drug testing is prohibited.
The bill, however, does not apply to the drug testing of an employee or
prospective employee who is subject to drug testing under 1) any regulation
promulgated by the federal Department of Transportation that requires drug testing
of an employee or prospective employee or any rule promulgated by the Department
of Transportation of this state adopting such a regulation for purposes of enforcing
the requirements of that regulation with respect to intrastate commerce; 2) any
contract entered into between the federal government and an employer or any grant
of financial assistance from the federal government to an employer that requires
drug testing of employees and prospective employees as a condition of receiving the
contract or grant; 3) any federal statute, regulation, or order that requires drug
testing of employees and prospective employees for purposes of safety or security; 4)
any substance abuse prevention program under a collective bargaining agreement
or under the current law that requires such programs for public works and public
utility projects; or 5) rules promulgated by the Law Enforcement Standards Board
requiring drug testing of prospective law enforcement officers, tribal law
enforcement officers, jail officers, and secure detention officers.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 7, 2018 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Bowen, Sargent, Spreitzer, Sinicki, Anderson, Brostoff, Subeck and Young
- Mar 7, 2018 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor
- Mar 15, 2018 · Assembly
Representative Ohnstad added as a coauthor
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Apr 5, 2018 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received