Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 1048

The seclusion and physical restraint of pupils

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 22, 2018

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Education. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes changes to the law governing physical restraint and seclusion of pupils in schools.

Under current law, individuals who work in a public school, including a charter school, or a private school participating in the Special Needs Scholarship Program (SNSP school) may only use seclusion or physical restraint on a pupil at school if certain conditions are met. One of the conditions under current law for using seclusion is that a door connecting the room or area in which the pupil is secluded cannot be capable of being locked. This bill further prohibits such a door from having a lock on it, even if the door is not capable of being locked. One of the conditions under current law for using physical restraint is that the individual restraining the pupil may not use certain maneuvers and techniques. This bill adds maneuvers and techniques that place the pupil in a prone position to this list of prohibited maneuvers and techniques.

Read the full summary

In addition, under current law, an individual employed by a school (covered individual) may not use physical restraint on a pupil at a public school or a SNSP school unless the covered individual has received training that includes specific components. This bill changes these components of the training by eliminating the requirements to include 1) methods of preventing the need for physical restraint; 2) experience in administering and receiving various types of physical restraint; and 3) that the individual demonstrates proficiency in administering physical restraint and by requiring that the training include 1) evidence-based instruction related to positive behavior supports and interventions; 2) evidence-based techniques shown to prevent or reduce the use of physical restraint; and 3) that the individual demonstrates the ability to identify prohibited techniques in administering physical restraint.

Current law provides certain notification and reporting requirements whenever seclusion or physical restraint is used on a pupil at a public school or an SNSP school. This bill specifies that these notice and reporting requirements apply whenever a covered individual or law enforcement officer uses seclusion or physical restraint on a pupil at the school. In addition, the bill requires the school principal to meet with the covered individuals who participated in the incident to discuss the events that occurred before, during, and after the use of seclusion or physical restraint on a pupil, and how to prevent the need for seclusion or physical restraint in the future.

The bill also creates similar notice, reporting, and debriefing requirements that apply whenever a covered individual or law enforcement officer uses seclusion or physical restraint on an LEA placed pupil at a private school. Under the bill, an “LEA placed pupil” is a pupil who is placed by a local educational agency at a private school to satisfy state or federal special education law or under a contractual agreement that requires the pupil's resident school district to pay the pupil's tuition at the private school.

Under current law, a principal of a public school or a SNSP school must annually report to the school's governing body the number of incidents of seclusion and physical restraint and the total number of pupils involved in the incident. Under the bill, a principal of a public school, SNSP school, or private school at which an LEA placed pupil is placed must report data about incidents of seclusion and physical restraint to the governing body of the school and to the Department of Public Instruction. Additionally, under the bill, the principal's report must provide data about incidents of seclusion separately from incidents of physical restraint and must include the total number of children with disabilities who were involved in each type of incident. Under the bill, DPI must include the information reported by principals on incidents of seclusion and physical restraint in the annual school and school district performance report.

Finally, under current law, the first time seclusion or physical restraint is used on a child with a disability, the child's Individualized Education Program team must convene as soon as possible and review the child's IEP to ensure that it contains appropriate interventions and supports to address the behavior of concern. Under the bill, a child's IEP team is required to meet to review the child's IEP as soon as practicable but no later than ten school days after the second time seclusion or physical restraint is used on the child within the same school year.

Who's behind it

13 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (6)

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 22, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.

  3. Mar 22, 2018

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Quinn, Considine, Berceau, Brostoff, Crowley, Kooyenga, Pope, Sargent, Subeck, C. Taylor, Tittl, Rodriguez and Felzkowski; cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Johnson, Bewley, Cowles, Darling and L. Taylor

  2. Mar 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor