Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 105

Replacement, reconstruction, and transfer of an approved high capacity well, recommendation of special groundwater measures by the Department of Natural Resources, and metering requirements and grants for certain high capacity wells

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 1, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes changes to the laws regulating high capacity wells, which are wells that, together with certain other wells on the same property, have the capacity to withdraw more than 100,000 gallons of water per day.

Activities exempt from approval Current law requires a person to obtain approval from the Department of Natural Resources before constructing or operating a high capacity well. This bill provides that no additional approval is needed for the owner of an approved high capacity well to 1) repair or maintain the well, 2) construct a replacement high capacity well, if the replacement well's purpose is to prevent contamination or if the replacement well will be substantially the same depth as the existing well and either within a 75-foot radius of the existing well or farther from the nearest groundwater protection area than the existing well, 3) reconstruct the well to substantially the same depth and specifications as the existing well, or 4) transfer the approval at the same time as the owner transfers the land on which the well is located. No additional fee is required for any of these actions, but the owner of the well must notify DNR of any replacement, reconstruction, or transfer. The owner may not take any of these actions if they would be inconsistent with the conditions included in the approval for the high capacity well, and the conditions of the approval continue to apply after any of these actions are taken.

Read the full summary

Designated study area This bill also requires DNR to evaluate and model the hydrology of Pleasant Lake in Waushara County and the Fourteenmile Creek Watershed, the Mecan River Watershed, and the Pine River and Willow Creek Watershed, located in parts of Adams, Green Lake, Juneau, Marquette, Portage, Waupaca, Waushara, Winnebago, and Wood counties (defined in the bill as the “designated study area”). DNR must begin its evaluation of the study area within one year after the effective date of the bill. If DNR determines that special measures relating to existing and potential groundwater withdrawal are necessary in all or part of the study area to prevent or remedy a significant reduction of a navigable stream's or navigable lake's rate of flow or water level below its average seasonal levels, DNR must issue a decision on whether it recommends that the legislature adopt, by statute, special measures relating to groundwater withdrawal in all or part of that area. DNR must hold a public hearing on its decision. Following the public hearing, the bill requires DNR to submit a report to the legislature describing what special measures, if any, it recommends that the legislature adopt in all or part of the study area. DNR must submit this report within three years after beginning its study of the study area.

The bill requires the owner of a new high capacity well located in the study area, or an owner who replaces, reconstructs, or transfers ownership of a high capacity well located in the study area, to provide, with the annual pumping report that it submits to DNR, readings from a water meter showing the well's water usage.

The bill also permits DNR to provide a qualified lake association or lake district with an approval to construct a high capacity well for the purpose of providing water to a lake located in the study area to assist DNR in evaluating and modeling the hydrology of that area, if DNR determines that the lake's water level has been significantly reduced below its average seasonal levels. Under the bill, DNR must waive the application fee and expedite the review and approval process for an application submitted by a qualified lake association or lake district, and may not issue an approval if it determines that providing water from the proposed high capacity well to a lake is likely to result in a violation of water quality standards for that lake. DNR must also develop and administer a financial assistance program to provide grants to qualified lake associations and lake districts to construct high capacity wells for this purpose.

Who's behind it

10 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 10 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (5)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 15, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Mar 1, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

  4. Mar 1, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 1, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tauchen, Nerison, Tittl, Vorpagel, R. Brooks, Spiros, Jacque, Jarchow, Kremer and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators S. Fitzgerald, Roth, Marklein, Wanggaard and Moulton

  2. Mar 1, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture

  3. Mar 15, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Krug

  5. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor