Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: forfeiture of property seized in relation to a crime. (FE)
Court — Procedure Crime and criminals Forfeiture Police
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill changes the procedure for forfeiture of property after it has been seized
in relation to a crime. Under current law, the state or a local law enforcement agency
may acquire certain property involved in the commission of a crime or seized in
relation to a criminal investigation through a forfeiture proceeding. The forfeiture
law applies to all property directly or indirectly derived from or used for the
commission of a crime. This bill allows property to be subject to forfeiture only after
a person has been convicted of the crime related to the forfeiture action and only if
a court finds that the property seized is proportional to the crime committed. If the
person is acquitted or the charges against the person are dropped, the court must
order that his or her property be returned within 30 days. The bill requires seized
property to be returned to innocent owners of the property unless the owners were
involved with or knowledgeable about the crime related to his or her property.
Further, the bill allows the court, upon petition by a person whose property was
seized but not yet forfeited, to return the property to the person under certain
circumstances. Under the bill, the person may not sell, give away, or burden the
property and, if the person is found to have committed the crime related to the
property, must surrender the property for forfeiture after conviction. This bill also
allows a person who prevails in a forfeiture action to recover reasonable attorney fees
from the state.
This bill requires that all proceeds from the sale of all forfeited property be
turned in to the state school fund. It also prohibits local law enforcement agencies
from transferring property to federal agencies for forfeiture under federal law unless
the value of the property exceeds $50,000 or the property can be forfeited only under
federal law.
Under current law, forfeiture proceedings may proceed prior to an actual
conviction in a criminal case, and any seized property will be held by the law
enforcement agency until the case is finished.
Under current law, after a court orders that property be forfeited, an agency
may keep certain property for its own use, transfer the property to another agency,
or sell the property. The agency that seized the property may retain a set percentage
of the proceeds of selling the property to cover administrative and other costs and the
remainder goes into the state school fund. In addition, current law allows local law
enforcement agencies to enter into agreements with federal authorities wherein
property that is seized in relation to a federal crime is turned over to the federal
authorities for forfeiture under federal law. Proceeds from selling the property are
then shared between the federal authorities and local law enforcement agencies.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 2, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Tauchen, Jarchow, Kessler, Kooyenga, Sanfelippo, Sargent, Riemer, Brostoff, Kuglitsch, Quinn, Knodl, Bowen, Kremer, Schraa, Sinicki, Wichgers, Mason, Gannon, Skowronski and Ripp; cosponsored by Senators Craig, Nass, Wirch, Tiffany, Kapenga, Stroebel and Lasee
- Mar 2, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
- Mar 6, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 10, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 2, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 25, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Tauchen
- Jul 10, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 12, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Tauchen
- Nov 3, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Vorpagel
- Jan 18, 2018 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly Substitute Amendment 2)
- Feb 7, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Tauchen
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1