Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 123

The information technology block grant program, the broadband expansion grant program, waiving certain fees and appraisals, and making appropriations. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on May 2, 2017, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 2, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed May 2, 2017

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes changes to the following: 1) a broadband grant program administered by the Public Service Commission; 2) the authority of the Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Transportation regarding certain fees relating to the construction of broadband infrastructure; and 3) the Technology for Educational Achievement program, known as TEACH, which is administered by the Department of Administration.

Broadband grants The bill makes changes to funding for grants made by the PSC for projects to construct broadband infrastructure in underserved areas. Under current law, $6,000,000 was transferred from the universal service fund (USF) for making the grants, but current law also limits the total grants made in a fiscal year to $1,500,000. The bill eliminates that limit. The bill also provides additional funding for the grants by doing the following: 1) transferring an additional $6,000,000 from the USF; 2) transferring $5,000,000 from moneys received under a federal program for assisting schools and libraries in obtaining telecommunications services and Internet access, which is commonly known as the federal e-rate program; and 3) at the end of each fiscal year, transferring the unencumbered balances from other USF-funded appropriations. Also, beginning in fiscal year 2017-18, the bill allows the PSC to fund its administration of the broadband grant program from contributions made by telecommunications providers to the USF.

Read the full summary

The bill also makes changes to the priorities for the PSC to make the grants.

One of the priorities under current law is for projects that affect areas with no broadband service providers. The bill repeals that priority and requires that the PSC give priority to projects in an “unserved area” designated by the PSC, which the bill defines as an area of this state that is not served by an Internet service provider offering Internet service that 1) is wired service or fixed wireless service; and 2) is provided at actual speeds of at least 20 percent of the upload and download speed for high-speed, switched, broadband telecommunications capability as designated by the Federal Communications Commission in its annual inquiries regarding advanced telecommunications capability. Another priority under current law is for projects that promote “economic development,” which is not defined. This bill defines “economic development” as development designed to promote job growth or retention, expand the property tax base, or improve the overall economic vitality of a town, village, city, county, or region. Also, the bill creates a new priority for projects that will not result in delaying the provision of broadband service to neighboring areas. In addition, the bill requires the PSC to consider the following in evaluating grant applications for proposed projects: 1) the degree to which the projects would duplicate existing broadband infrastructure; 2) impacts on the ability of individuals to access health care services from home and the cost of those services; and 3) impacts on the ability of students to access educational opportunities from home.

DNR and DOT fees The bill prohibits DNR from requiring any appraisal or charging any fee prior to granting an easement for the construction of broadband infrastructure in underserved areas. In addition, the bill prohibits DOT from charging any fee for the initial issuance of any permit necessary to construct broadband infrastructure in underserved areas.

TEACH program Under current law, the TEACH program offers telecommunications access to school districts, private schools, cooperative educational service agencies, technical college districts, independent charter school authorizers, juvenile correctional facilities, private and tribal colleges, and public library boards at discounted rates and by subsidizing the cost of installing data lines and video links. As part of the TEACH program, DOA awards information technology block grants to school districts to improve information technology infrastructure. Under current law, the information technology block grant program ends on July 1, 2017.

This bill delays the sunset of the information technology block grant program until July 1, 2019. The bill also changes the eligibility criteria for these grants from a school district that has 13 pupils per square mile to a school district that has 16 pupils per square mile and a membership of 2,500 or less. In addition, the bill authorizes DOA to award an additional round of information technology block grants before July 1, 2017. These grants are in addition to any grants a school district may have already received under the program during the 2015-17 biennium and therefore do not count towards the maximum amount a school district may receive in a biennium. The bill also consolidates the appropriations for TEACH contracts into a single appropriation. Finally, in fiscal year 2016-17, the bill transfers $7,500,000 of moneys received under the federal e-rate program to the consolidated appropriation for TEACH contracts.

Who's behind it

33 lawmakers are its ⁠. 29 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 42 names

Authors (33)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 8 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 20, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote to recommend it

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 20, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 25, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 25, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended, with emergency statement attached, pursuant to s.16.47 (2), Wisconsin Statutes, recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 64 to 34 · May 2, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 64, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 64 to 34 · May 2, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 64, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 98 to 0 · May 2, 2017 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (98)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · May 5, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 9, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization,.

  3. May 12, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. May 10, 2017

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 5-10-2017” (the official wording)

  5. May 5, 2017

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. May 4, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. May 3, 2017

    The Senate received it.

  8. May 2, 2017

    The Assembly passed it, 98 to 0.

  9. May 2, 2017

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Apr 25, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Apr 25, 2017

    “Report passage as amended, with emergency statement attached, pursuant to s.16.47 (2), Wisconsin Statutes, recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Apr 20, 2017

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  13. Apr 20, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  14. Mar 21, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Mar 21, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Mar 16, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Mar 13, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Mar 2, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.

  19. Mar 2, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Quinn, Petryk, E. Brooks, Tranel, Ballweg, Bernier, Edming, Felzkowski, Kitchens, Krug, Kulp, Mursau, Nerison, Novak, Pronschinske, Ripp, Snyder, Spiros, Summerfield, Tauchen, Tusler, VanderMeer, Zimmerman, Tittl, Skowronski, Nygren, Horlacher, Schraa, Wachs, Considine, Meyers, Spreitzer and Allen; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Testin, Feyen, Lasee, Petrowski, Olsen, Darling, Ringhand and Tiffany

  2. Mar 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. Mar 13, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 16, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 16, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 21, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Mar 21, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Apr 17, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Quinn

  9. Apr 17, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Spreitzer and Meyers

  10. Apr 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Apr 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  12. Apr 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  13. Apr 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  14. Apr 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  15. Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  16. Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended, with emergency statement attached, pursuant to s.16.47 (2), Wisconsin Statutes, recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  17. Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  18. Apr 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-2-2017 by Committee on Rules

  19. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  21. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representatives Barca, Doyle, Hesselbein and Spreitzer

  22. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 64, Noes 34

  23. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representatives Shankland and Barca

  24. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 64, Noes 34

  25. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  27. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 98, Noes 0

  28. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. May 3, 2017 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  30. May 4, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  31. May 4, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  32. May 5, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  33. May 5, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-10-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  34. May 10, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Carpenter, Hansen, Vinehout, Wirch and Risser

  35. May 10, 2017 · Senate

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 5-10-2017

  36. May 12, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  37. Jun 9, 2017 · Senate

    Referred to the committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (4)

  38. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote