Assembly Bill 142
Use of the construction manager-general contractor process for highway project contracting, major highway project reports, and cost-benefit analyses of certain services related to transportation
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 10, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill implements the legislative changes recommended by the Legislative Audit Bureau in LAB's January 2017 report regarding the state highway program.
Under current law, DOT administers a major highway projects program. With limited exceptions, a major highway project is either 1) a project having a total cost of more than $30,000,000 and involving a) construction of a new highway 2.5 miles or more in length; b) reconstruction or reconditioning of an existing highway that relocates at least 2.5 miles of the highway or adds one or more lanes five miles or more in length to the highway; or c) improvement of an existing multilane, divided highway to freeway standards or 2) a project having a total cost of at least $75,000,000. For both categories of major highway projects, DOT annually adjusts the total cost threshold based on an inflation index.
Read the full summary Show less
For major highway projects of the first type, the project must generally receive the approval of the Transportation Projects Commission and the legislature (generally referred to as “enumeration") before the project may be constructed. For major highway projects of the second type, DOT must submit a report to TPC and request TPC approval to proceed with the project under a passive review process.
Once approved by TPC, the project is considered enumerated as a major highway project under the statutes.
Among the requirements of the program, DOT must provide TPC with any studies and cost estimates with respect to a proposed project that are requested by TPC.
This bill specifies that when DOT provides a full project cost estimate under this requirement, the estimate must include all costs associated with the project, including all costs before enumeration, design engineering and construction engineering costs, the costs of environmental studies, and costs of the project that are paid by another program of the department. A full project cost estimate must also include the expected date of completion and an estimate of the effects of construction cost inflation and unexpected costs on the cost of the project.
Also under current law, every six months, DOT must submit a report to the TPC that summarizes the current status of each major highway project and identifies all actual and estimated project costs, itemized by major cost categories, as of the date of preparation of the report. The project information included in these reports must be reported on both a cumulative basis from the inception of the project and on an updated basis for the period since the department's last report.
Under this bill, these reports must also include for each project the full project cost estimate of the project made for the commission as of the date of the commission's approval of the project. This bill also specifies that the report must treat separately and as described in the enumerating statute each project.
This bill also requires DOT to annually prepare and submit to certain legislative committees a report that provides all of the following information for each major highway project:
1. The full project cost estimate of the project as of the date of enumeration.
2. The year in which the department expects to complete the project as of the date of enumeration.
3. The costs incurred as of the date of preparation of the report.
4. The full project cost estimate as of the date of preparation of the report.
5. The year in which the department expects to complete the project as of the date of preparation of the report.
6. An explanation of any difference between the full project cost estimates under items 1. and 4.
7. The opinion of the department as to whether the project will be completed as originally scheduled without the allocation of additional funds.
The bill also specifies that this report must treat separately and as described in the enumerating statute each project.
Under current law, highway improvement projects undertaken by DOT must be executed by contract based on bids, with limited exceptions. This bill authorizes DOT, for no more than three highway improvement projects, to enter into contracts using a construction manager-general contractor process. Under this process, the department contracts with a provider of construction services to supervise the design work for the project and, subject to an acceptable proposal, contracts with the provider of construction services for construction of the project. This bill authorizes DOT to enter into no more than three design contracts utilizing the construction manager-general contractor process no later than July 1, 2021.
Under current law, DOT may engage engineering, consulting, surveying, or other specialized services and this engagement of services is exempt from certain provisions of law relating to state procurement. For an engagement of services of more than $300,000, DOT must conduct a uniform cost-benefit analysis before the engagement and must review periodically, and before any renewal, the continued appropriateness of the engagement. Under this bill, when DOT conducts a cost-benefit analysis under this provision, DOT must also consider and document the results of the analysis before determining whether to undertake the proposed engagement.
Who's behind it
The official record doesn't name its authors.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment
Passed, 13 to 0 · May 15, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment
Passed, 11 to 2 · May 15, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it
Passed, 12 to 2 · May 15, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 28, 2018
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
May 15, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
May 15, 2017
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 2.
-
Mar 28, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 10, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.
-
Mar 10, 2017
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 10, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Joint Legislative Audit Committee
- Mar 10, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation
- Mar 28, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 20, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Ripp
- Apr 20, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Ripp
- Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 15, 2017 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- May 15, 2017 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 2
- May 15, 2017 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 2
- May 15, 2017 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote