Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 164

Cosmetology and barbering continuing education requirements and licensure of barbers, cosmetologists, and related professionals from jurisdictions outside Wisconsin. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 20, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill eliminates continuing education requirements for cosmetologists, aestheticians, manicurists, and electrologists. Under current law, the Cosmetology Examining Board can require persons holding any of those licenses to complete continuing education 1) as a part of the disciplinary process to ensure the person's professional competency; or 2) if doing so is necessary to preserve the public health, safety, or welfare.

The bill also removes continuing education requirements for barbers. Under current law, the Department of Safety and Professional Services has the authority to require barbers to complete continuing education until completing eight years of practice as a licensed barber.

Read the full summary

Additionally, the bill eliminates the requirement that an applicant who is licensed as a cosmetologist, aesthetician, manicurist, electrologist, or barber in another jurisdiction must have completed 4,000 hours of experience in the licensed practice in order to be granted a reciprocal license. The bill maintains the requirement for a reciprocal license in current law that an applicant licensed in another jurisdiction has never been disciplined by the licensing authority of another jurisdiction and is not a party to a proceeding before the licensing agency in which it is alleged that the applicant was negligent or violated the law in the licensed practice.

Who's behind it

21 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 21 are Republicans.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 30 names

Authors (21)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jun 20, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 2 · Jun 20, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 6, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 9, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  3. Jun 20, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Jun 20, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 2.

  5. Apr 18, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Apr 6, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Mar 30, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Mar 21, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  9. Mar 20, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform.

  10. Mar 20, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kooyenga, Kleefisch, Allen, Berceau, Brandtjen, R. Brooks, Doyle, Duchow, Felzkowski, Fields, Horlacher, Hutton, Jacque, Jarchow, Katsma, Knodl, Kremer, Krug, Macco, Mursau, Neylon, Petryk, Skowronski and Spiros; cosponsored by Senators Kapenga, L. Taylor, Craig, Darling, Harsdorf and Nass

  2. Mar 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform

  3. Mar 21, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Murphy added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 30, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 4, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Berceau withdrawn as a coauthor

  6. Apr 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Doyle withdrawn as a coauthor

  7. Apr 6, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Apr 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  9. May 3, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Fields withdrawn as a coauthor

  10. May 23, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kooyenga

  11. Jun 1, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Jun 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  13. Jun 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 6, Noes 2

  14. Jun 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Bernier added as a coauthor

  16. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote