Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: remediation of contaminated land; air pollution control requirements for certain manufacturing facilities constructed on formerly contaminated land; reassigning tax deeds on tax delinquent brownfield properties; creating a new method for the creation of environmental remediation tax incremental financing districts; loans and repayment assistance by a political subdivision for certain brownfield revitalization projects and collection of the debt by special charge; state trust fund loans for brownfield projects; conversion of business improvement districts; and annexations to business improvement districts and neighborhood improvement districts. (FE)
Air pollution Business County Environmental protection Industrial development Municipality Municipality — Planning Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Property tax Public lands, board of commissioners of Real property Trust fund Village
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Remediating contaminated land
Current law requires a person who possesses or controls property where there
is a hazardous substance in the soil or groundwater, or who caused the discharge of
a hazardous substance, to restore the environment and minimize the harmful effects
of the discharge. A person who possesses or controls property where there is a
hazardous substance in the soil or groundwater is exempt from these requirements
if the person did not cause the discharge, if the discharge originated from another
person's property, and if the person agrees to allow the Department of Natural
Resources or the person who caused the discharge to enter the property to investigate
and remedy the discharge.
When there is a hazardous substance in the soil or groundwater, it may be
emitted as a vapor. This bill provides that a person who possesses or controls
property where there is a hazardous substance in vapor emitted from the soil or
groundwater is also exempt from the remediation requirements if the person did not
cause the discharge, if the discharge originated from another person's property, and
if the person agrees to allow DNR or the person who caused the discharge to enter
the property to investigate and remedy the discharge.
Current law also provides that if a person who possesses or controls property
contaminated by a hazardous substance, or who caused the discharge of a hazardous
substance, voluntarily undertakes certain investigation and remediation actions on
the contaminated property that are approved by DNR, the person is exempt from
liability for certain other investigation and remediation actions and their costs.
This bill provides a definition of the term “property" in relation to the voluntary
party liability exemption for remediation of contaminated land. The bill also
provides that a property may be subdivided or transferred without affecting the
liability exemption or requiring a new application.
Pilot program
Current federal law and state law require construction permits and operation
permits for certain stationary sources of air pollution. Under certain circumstances,
DNR may issue a registration permit authorizing construction or operation or both
for a stationary source with low actual or potential emissions.
This bill creates a pilot program under which a participating owner or operator
of a stationary source is not required to make changes to the source's air pollution
controls due to new or modified legal requirements, except as required under the
federal Clean Air Act, for ten years after DNR issues a registration permit for the
source. This exemption would apply only if the source 1) is classified as a minor
source, which is a facility that emits air contaminants from a fixed location in an
amount that is less than an amount specified by DNR by rule; 2) is a manufacturing
facility that is being constructed on formerly contaminated land that has been
certified by DNR as having been remediated; and 3) is included in the Green Tier
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Jacque (R) , Skowronski (R) , Thiesfeldt (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Environment and Forestry, Ayes 10, Noes 1
Passed 10–1 Nov 7, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Environment and Forestry, Ayes 10, Noes 1
Passed 10–1 Nov 7, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 28, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Thiesfeldt and Skowronski; cosponsored by Senators Cowles and Olsen
- Mar 28, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Environment and Forestry
- Mar 29, 2017 · Assembly
Representative Allen added as a coauthor
- Apr 12, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 17, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 16, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 11, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Jacque
- Oct 26, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Jacque
- Nov 1, 2017 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Environment and Forestry, Ayes 10, Noes 1
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-9-2017 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Environment and Forestry, Ayes 10, Noes 1
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1