Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: personal delivery devices and providing a penalty. (FE)
Motor vehicle Motor vehicle — Regulation Street
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill authorizes the operation of personal delivery devices (PDDs) on
sidewalks and crosswalks.
Under this bill, a PDD is defined as an electronically powered device that 1) is
intended primarily to transport property on sidewalks and crosswalks; 2) weighs less
than 80 pounds, excluding cargo; 3) is capable of a maximum speed of 10 miles per
hour or less; and 4) is capable of operating with and without active control or
monitoring by an individual. A PDD operator is defined as an entity or its agent that
exercises control over, or that monitors, the navigation system and operation of the
PDD.
This bill authorizes the operation of a PDD on any sidewalk or crosswalk, unless
the authority with jurisdiction of the sidewalk or crosswalk prohibits such operation.
In general, PDD operators must ensure that a PDD operates in compliance with rules
of the road regulating the conduct of pedestrians. In addition, PDD operators must
ensure that all of the following are satisfied when operating a PDD on a sidewalk or
crosswalk:
1. A PDD operator must control or monitor the navigation and operation of the
PDD.
2. A PDD may not go on a roadway except while crossing at a crosswalk.
3. A PDD must be operated with due care.
4. A PDD must comply with each traffic signal and sign.
5. The speed of a PDD may not exceed 10 miles per hour.
This bill also provides that a PDD must be equipped with a braking system, a
plate or marker that is in a position to be clearly visible and that identifies the name
and contact information of the PDD operator, and, if operated during hours of
darkness, a white light visible from the front and a red reflector visible from the rear.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science and Technology, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 May 3, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science and Technology, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 May 3, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 29, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kuglitsch, Steffen, Jagler, Krug, Kulp, Murphy, Quinn, Ripp, Sanfelippo, Thiesfeldt, Tusler and Skowronski; cosponsored by Senators Kapenga, Risser, Testin and Darling
- Mar 29, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Science and Technology
- Apr 5, 2017 · Assembly
Representative Spiros added as a coauthor
- Apr 19, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kuglitsch
- Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 26, 2017 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 3, 2017 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- May 3, 2017 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science and Technology, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- May 3, 2017 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science and Technology, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- May 4, 2017 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-10-2017 by Committee on Rules
- May 10, 2017 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1