Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 197

Revocation of operating privilege for certain offenses related to operating while intoxicated, operating after revocation, making an appropriation, and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 4, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill provides for permanent revocation of a person's operating privilege if the person commits certain offenses related to drunken driving or driving under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug (OWI offenses).

Under current law, the Department of Transportation may revoke or suspend a person's operating privilege if the person commits certain traffic offenses or crimes, such as operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The period of revocation varies based on the reason for the revocation, generally ranging from several months to a year.

Read the full summary

Suspensions of operating privileges may also be ordered by a court adjudicating an underlying criminal or traffic offense. Suspensions by a court also vary in length based on the underlying criminal or traffic offense, ranging from several months to several years.

Also under current law, if a person's operating privilege is suspended or revoked, the person may apply for an occupational license, which restricts when and where the person is allowed to drive, such as to and from work. In most cases, the person is eligible for an occupational license 15 days after the date of the suspension or revocation. In some cases involving serious offenses, the person is not eligible for an occupational license until one year after the date of the suspension or revocation.

Also under current law, with limited exceptions, DOT may reinstate a person's revoked operating privilege if all of the following apply: 1) the period of revocation has expired; 2) the person pays DOT all required fees; 3) the person passes any examination required by DOT; and 4) with exceptions, the person files proof of financial responsibility with DOT and maintains it for three years.

This bill requires DOT to permanently revoke the operating privilege of a person who meets either of the following requirements:

1. The person has committed four or more OWI offenses.

2. The person has committed two or more OWI offenses and has two or more “qualifying convictions." A qualifying conviction is 1) a conviction for certain homicides that involve the use of a motor vehicle or 2) a conviction for certain felonies involving the use of a motor vehicle.

A person whose operating privilege is revoked under this bill is not eligible for an occupational license. After ten years of the revocation period have elapsed, the person, however, may apply for reinstatement of his or her operating privilege. DOT may reinstate the person's operating privilege if the person meets the general requirements for reinstatement and all of the following apply: 1) the person has not been convicted of certain felonies or misdemeanors related to motor vehicle use during the ten-year period immediately preceding the application for reinstatement; and 2) the person submits to and complies with an assessment by an approved public treatment facility for examination of the person's use of alcohol and controlled substances and development of a driver safety plan for the person.

Current law prohibits a person from operating a motor vehicle on a highway during any period in which the person's motor vehicle operating privilege is revoked (operating after revocation or OAR). Under current law, a person convicted of OAR is subject to a forfeiture of not more than $2,500 unless certain penalty enhancing conditions apply. Among these, if the underlying revocation was the result of specified traffic violations involving alcohol or controlled substances, the person convicted of OAR is subject to a fine of not more than $2,500 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

Under this bill, a person convicted of a second or subsequent OAR based on a permanent revocation, as provided in this bill, is subject to a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

Because this bill proposes to revoke a person's operating privilege upon conviction for an offense, the Department of Transportation, as required by law, will prepare a report to be printed as an appendix to this bill.

Who's behind it

10 lawmakers are its ⁠. 9 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 2 · Feb 20, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 22, 2018

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Feb 20, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Feb 20, 2018

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 2.

  5. Feb 13, 2018

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Dec 5, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Oct 18, 2017 to Dec 5, 2017

    3 more representatives signed on in support.

  8. May 4, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. May 3, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Apr 27, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Apr 14, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Apr 5, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Apr 4, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  14. Apr 4, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 4, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Spiros, Jacque, Allen, Berceau, Horlacher, Katsma, Kleefisch, Novak, Skowronski and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard and Marklein

  2. Apr 4, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Apr 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 3, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. May 4, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Oct 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Rohrkaste added as a coauthor

  9. Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Representatives Macco and Wachs added as coauthors

  10. Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  11. Dec 19, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 13, 2018 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  13. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2

  14. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:02 PM on 2-22-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 27

  16. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  17. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Representatives Barca and Vruwink added as coauthors

  18. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote