Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 210

Requiring the state auditor to appoint an inspector general to investigate Department of Transportation programs and activities and making an appropriation. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 10, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Transportation. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the state auditor to appoint within the Legislative Audit Bureau an inspector general who is assigned to and housed at the headquarters of the Department of Transportation and whose services are paid for by DOT. The state auditor appoints the inspector general for a six-year term expiring on March 1 of the odd-numbered year.

The bill provides that the inspector general may examine the accounts and other financial records of DOT and may review the performance and program accomplishments of DOT. The inspector general must at all times with or without notice have access to any books, records, or other documents maintained by DOT relating to its expenditures, revenues, operations, and structure.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, the inspector general must investigate fraud in DOT programs or activities and report any finding of fraud to the Department of Justice, as well as investigate waste, abuse, or inefficiency in DOT programs or activities. The inspector general must report any finding of waste, abuse, or inefficiency to the Speaker of the assembly, the senate majority leader, the joint legislative audit committee, the assembly and senate committees on transportation, and the chairpersons of standing committees whose committee jurisdiction includes oversight and accountability of government operations. In addition, in investigating waste, abuse, or inefficiency, the inspector general must endeavor to identify savings for DOT that would pay at least the costs incurred by the inspector general in carrying out the investigations.

Under the bill, the inspector general must submit an annual report of inspector general activities to the Speaker of the assembly, the senate majority leader, the joint legislative audit committee, the assembly and senate committees on transportation, and the chairpersons of standing committees whose committee jurisdiction includes oversight and accountability of government operations.

The bill provides that the Speaker of the assembly and the senate majority leader, jointly, may direct the inspector general to examine the records or programs of DOT. The chairpersons of the joint legislative audit committee, the assembly and senate committees on transportation, and the chairpersons of standing committees whose committee jurisdiction includes oversight and accountability of government operations may also direct the inspector general to examine the records or programs of DOT.

Under the bill, upon request of the inspector general, legislative service agencies must assist the inspector general in performing any of his or her duties or exercising any of his or her powers.

Finally, the bill provides that the inspector general may review claims by any person whose substantial interest has been adversely affected by a DOT action or order. A person requesting such a review must do so before the commencement of a contested case or other similar state agency review process. If the inspector general elects to review a claim, the inspector general must determine whether the DOT action or order was inconsistent with any law or administrative rule. The inspector general must report all such determinations to the Speaker of the assembly, the senate majority leader, the joint legislative audit committee, the assembly and senate committees on transportation, and the chairpersons of standing committees whose committee jurisdiction includes oversight and accountability of government operations.

Who's behind it

13 lawmakers are its ⁠. 12 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. May 2, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Apr 25, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Apr 20, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Apr 10, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  6. Apr 10, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sanfelippo, Kremer, Skowronski, Quinn, Thiesfeldt, Kuglitsch, Duchow, Tittl, Bowen, Wichgers, Weatherston, Murphy and Tranel; cosponsored by Senators Craig, Feyen, Lasee and Darling

  2. Apr 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Apr 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. May 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate