Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: prohibiting an employer from relying on or inquiring about a prospective employee's current or prior compensation and from restricting an employee's right to disclose compensation information and providing a penalty. (FE)
Discrimination in employment Employment Privacy
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill prohibits certain employer conduct related to compensation
information of current and prospective employees.
The bill prohibits an employer from doing any of the following with respect to
a prospective employee:
1. Relying on or soliciting information about the prospective employee's current
or prior compensation.
2. Requiring that the prospective employee's current or prior compensation
meet certain criteria in order for the prospective employee to be considered for
employment.
3. Refusing to hire the prospective employee for exercising his or her rights
relating to compensation information.
The bill also prohibits an employer from discharging or discriminating against
a current employee for disclosing the details of the employee's compensation,
discussing the compensation of other employees, asking other employees for details
regarding their compensation, or taking certain actions to enforce an employee's
rights under the bill.
The bill requires employers to post notices, where notices to employees are
customarily posted and on any electronic job posting, regarding employees' and
prospective employees' rights under the bill and provides a penalty for an employer's
failure to do so.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Crowley (D) , Fields (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Kessler (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Meyers (D) , Milroy (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Labor and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59
Failed 34–59 Feb 22, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 10, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Sinicki, Ohnstad, Hesselbein, Spreitzer, Meyers, Anderson, Berceau, Billings, Brostoff, Bowen, Crowley, Fields, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Kessler, Kolste, Mason, Milroy, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Shankland, Stuck, Subeck, C. Taylor, Wachs, Young, Zamarripa and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Ringhand, Johnson, Carpenter, Erpenbach, C. Larson, Miller, Risser, Shilling, L. Taylor and Wirch
- Apr 10, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor
- Apr 25, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 27, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Labor and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1