Assembly Bill 327
Surplus retention limitations for providers of rate-based services purchased by certain state and county departments and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
May 16, 2017
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Government Accountability and Oversight. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes certain changes with respect to the retention and disposition of surpluses generated by a provider of rate-based client services purchased by the Department of Children and Families, the Department of Corrections, the Department of Health Services, or a county department of human services, social services, community programs, or developmental disabilities services (county department).
Current law permits a nonprofit, nonstock corporation that contracts with DCF, DOC, DHS, or a county department to provide rate-based client services (provider) to retain up to 5 percent of the contract amount from any surplus revenues received under the contract. Current law permits a provider to use those retained funds only to cover a deficit between revenue and allowable costs incurred in any preceding or future contract period for the same rate-based service that generated the surplus or to address the programmatic needs of clients served by that service.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill provides that a contract for a rate-based service must allow a provider to retain from a surplus up to 5 percent of the revenue received under the contract until a different percentage is determined by DCF, DOC, or DHS by rule. Any total annual surplus exceeding the amount the provider is allowed to retain under the bill must be refunded upon written request of the purchasers of the rate-based service.
The bill also eliminates the restrictions on the expenditure of the surplus funds retained by the provider.
Under current law, if the provider accumulates funds from more than one contract period in an amount greater than 10 percent of all current contracts, the provider must, at the request of a purchaser, refund the purchaser's proportional share of that excess. The provider must then use any of that excess that is not refunded to a purchaser to reduce the provider's unit rate per client service in the next contract period. In addition, current law provides that if a provider has held an accumulated reserve of 10 percent or more of the amount of all current contracts for that rate-based service for four consecutive contract periods, the provider must apply 50 percent of those accumulated funds to reducing its unit rate per client service in the next contract period. This bill eliminates those 10 percent accumulated surplus retention limits.
Who's behind it
11 lawmakers are its . 9 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 15 names Hide the names
Authors (11)
- Jill Billings · Democrat, Assembly
- Cindi Duchow · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Hutton · Republican, Senate
- Terry Katsma · Republican, Assembly
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Rohrkaste · Republican, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (4)
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Mar 28, 2018
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Jul 5, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 5, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 16, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Government Accountability and Oversight.
-
May 16, 2017
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- May 16, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kooyenga, Rohrkaste, Billings, Duchow, Hutton, Katsma, Kulp, Murphy, Ripp, Subeck and Tittl; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Harsdorf, Olsen and Stroebel
- May 16, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Accountability and Oversight
- Jun 5, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate