Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: the creation of a private retirement security plan and making appropriations. (FE)
Employee trust funds, department of Retirement — Private plans
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Employee Trust Fund Board (ETF board) administers
the Wisconsin Retirement System under which public employees who are covered
under the WRS and their employers pay contributions to the WRS and the WRS,
from those contributions and the earnings on those contributions, provides
retirement annuities to those public employees.
This bill creates a Wisconsin Private Retirement Security Board (board) and
requires the board to establish a private retirement security plan (plan) to provide
retirement benefits for residents of this state who choose to participate in the plan.
Specifically, the bill requires the board to do all of the following:
1. Conduct a study to determine the feasibility of establishing a plan. The
feasibility study must estimate the potential population that is likely to choose to
participate in the plan and the potential cost of implementing the plan and must
recommend a design and structure for the plan that is most reasonable in light of that
potential population and cost.
2. Hold public hearings to receive testimony relating to the feasibility study
and the recommended design and structure of the plan. The board must hold not less
than five public hearings and must hold those hearings over a period of not more than
three months. The board may hold no more than one public hearing in Madison and
must ensure that at least one public hearing is held in each geographic area of the
state, including the southeastern part of the state, the western part of the state, the
northern part of the state, and the northeastern part of the state.
3. Based on the feasibility study, the recommended design and structure of the
plan, and the testimony received at the public hearings, design the plan. The board
must design the plan so that, to the greatest extent possible, the design and structure
of the plan are reasonably commensurate with the design and structure of the WRS.
In designing the plan, the board must provide for the State of Wisconsin Investment
Board to assist the board in managing and investing the assets of the fund and the
assets of the accounts of participants in the plan and must provide for the ETF board
to assist the board in administering the plan.
4. By no later than the first day of the 18th month beginning after the effective
date of the bill, submit a report to the legislature, the governor, and the members of
the Joint Committee on Finance summarizing the conclusions of the feasibility
study, the testimony received at the public hearings, and the design of the plan. The
report must also include an estimate of the cost of initial establishment and
administration of the plan, an estimate of the amount of time necessary to make the
plan viable, and a recommendation for any legislation that is necessary to implement
the plan. If no legislation is recommended, the board must implement the plan.
In addition, the bill requires the Department of Employee Trust Funds to 1)
provide staff and other resources to assist the board in the performance of the board's
duties under the bill; and 2) submit an estimate to JCF for supplemental funds from
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Crowley (D) , Doyle (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Kolste (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wachs (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59
Failed 34–59 Feb 22, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 21, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Genrich, Crowley, Anderson, Berceau, Billings, Brostoff, Considine, Doyle, Goyke, Hebl, Hintz, Kolste, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Shankland, Spreitzer, Subeck, C. Taylor, Vruwink, Wachs, Zamarripa and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Ringhand, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Johnson, Larson, Miller, Shilling, Vinehout and Wirch
- Jun 21, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
- Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1