Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: marriage between persons of the same sex and extending parentage rights to married couples of the same sex. (FE)
Children — Adoption Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Marriage Statutes — Revision Vital statistics
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Summary
This bill recognizes same-sex marriage by making references in the statutes
to spouses gender neutral, with the intent of harmonizing the Wisconsin statutes
with the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584,
192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015), which recognizes that same-sex couples have a fundamental
constitutional right to marriage. The bill also recognizes legal parentage for
same-sex couples under certain circumstances.
Same-sex marriage
This bill provides that marriage may be contracted between persons of the same
sex and confers the same rights and responsibilities on married persons of the same
sex that married persons of different sexes have under current law. The bill defines
“spouse" as a person who is legally married to another person of the same sex or a
different sex and replaces every reference to “husband" or “wife" in current law with
“spouse." The bill makes applicable to married persons of the same sex all provisions
under current law that apply to married persons of different sexes. These provisions
relate to such diverse areas of the law as income tax, marital property, inheritance
rights, divorce, child and spousal support, insurance coverage, family and spousal
recreational licenses, consent to conduct an autopsy, domestic abuse, and eligibility
for various types of benefits, such as retirement or death benefits and medical
assistance.
Same-sex parents
In addition to making statutory references to spouses gender neutral, the bill
specifies ways in which married couples of the same sex may be the legal parents of
a child and, with some exceptions, makes current references in the statutes to
“mother" and “father," and related terms, gender neutral.
Under current law, all of the following may adopt a child: a husband and wife
jointly, a husband or wife whose spouse is the parent of the child, and an unmarried
adult. Because the bill makes references in the statutes to spouses gender neutral,
same-sex spouses jointly may adopt a child and become the legal parents of the child,
and a same-sex spouse of a person who is the parent of a minor child may adopt the
child and become the legal parent of his or her spouse's child.
Under current law, if a woman is artificially inseminated under the supervision
of a physician with semen donated by a man who is not her husband and the husband
consents in writing to the artificial insemination of his wife, the husband is the
natural father of any child conceived. Under this bill, a same-sex spouse may also
consent to the artificial insemination of her spouse with donated semen and is the
natural parent of the child conceived. The artificial insemination is not required to
take place under the supervision of a physician, but, if it does not, the semen used
for the insemination must have been obtained from a sperm bank.
Under current law, there is a paternity presumption whereby a man is
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Crowley (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Constitution and Ethics and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59
Failed 34–59 Feb 22, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 30, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Spreitzer, Zamarripa, C. Taylor, Anderson, Berceau, Billings, Bowen, Considine, Crowley, Genrich, Goyke, Hesselbein, Hintz, Kolste, Mason, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Shankland, Stuck, Subeck, Wachs, Young and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Carpenter, Bewley, Johnson, Larson, Miller, Ringhand, Risser, Shilling and Vinehout
- Jun 30, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Constitution and Ethics
- Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 10, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 11, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 11, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 17, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 18, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 11, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Constitution and Ethics and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1