Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 417

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: marriage between persons of the same sex and extending parentage rights to married couples of the same sex. (FE)

Children — Adoption Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Marriage Statutes — Revision Vital statistics

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Summary

This bill recognizes same-sex marriage by making references in the statutes

to spouses gender neutral, with the intent of harmonizing the Wisconsin statutes

with the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584,

192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015), which recognizes that same-sex couples have a fundamental

constitutional right to marriage. The bill also recognizes legal parentage for

same-sex couples under certain circumstances.

Same-sex marriage

This bill provides that marriage may be contracted between persons of the same

sex and confers the same rights and responsibilities on married persons of the same

sex that married persons of different sexes have under current law. The bill defines

“spouse" as a person who is legally married to another person of the same sex or a

different sex and replaces every reference to “husband" or “wife" in current law with

“spouse." The bill makes applicable to married persons of the same sex all provisions

under current law that apply to married persons of different sexes. These provisions

relate to such diverse areas of the law as income tax, marital property, inheritance

rights, divorce, child and spousal support, insurance coverage, family and spousal

recreational licenses, consent to conduct an autopsy, domestic abuse, and eligibility

for various types of benefits, such as retirement or death benefits and medical

assistance.

Same-sex parents

In addition to making statutory references to spouses gender neutral, the bill

specifies ways in which married couples of the same sex may be the legal parents of

a child and, with some exceptions, makes current references in the statutes to

“mother" and “father," and related terms, gender neutral.

Under current law, all of the following may adopt a child: a husband and wife

jointly, a husband or wife whose spouse is the parent of the child, and an unmarried

adult. Because the bill makes references in the statutes to spouses gender neutral,

same-sex spouses jointly may adopt a child and become the legal parents of the child,

and a same-sex spouse of a person who is the parent of a minor child may adopt the

child and become the legal parent of his or her spouse's child.

Under current law, if a woman is artificially inseminated under the supervision

of a physician with semen donated by a man who is not her husband and the husband

consents in writing to the artificial insemination of his wife, the husband is the

natural father of any child conceived. Under this bill, a same-sex spouse may also

consent to the artificial insemination of her spouse with donated semen and is the

natural parent of the child conceived. The artificial insemination is not required to

take place under the supervision of a physician, but, if it does not, the semen used

for the insemination must have been obtained from a sperm bank.

Under current law, there is a paternity presumption whereby a man is

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Crowley (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)

9 cosponsors

Bewley (D) , Carpenter (D) , Johnson (D) , Larson (D) , Miller (D) , Ringhand (D) , Risser (D) , Shilling (D) , Vinehout (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Constitution and Ethics and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59

Failed 34–59 Feb 22, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 30, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Spreitzer, Zamarripa, C. Taylor, Anderson, Berceau, Billings, Bowen, Considine, Crowley, Genrich, Goyke, Hesselbein, Hintz, Kolste, Mason, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Shankland, Stuck, Subeck, Wachs, Young and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Carpenter, Bewley, Johnson, Larson, Miller, Ringhand, Risser, Shilling and Vinehout

  2. Jun 30, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Constitution and Ethics

  3. Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jul 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jul 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jul 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Jul 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Jul 17, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Jul 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Aug 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Constitution and Ethics and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59

  14. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1