Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 44

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: legislative and congressional redistricting. (FE)

Legislative reference bureau Legislature Redistricting

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Currently, under the state constitution, the legislature is directed to redistrict

legislative districts according to the number of inhabitants at its next session

following each decennial federal census. At the same intervals, the legislature also

reapportions congressional districts in this state pursuant to federal law. Under

current state law, following each decennial federal census, most municipalities are

also required to divide their territory into wards. With limited exceptions, wards are

required to consist of one or more whole, contiguous census blocks (the smallest

geographic units for which census results are available). Traditionally, the

legislature has used municipal wards to construct legislative and congressional

districts, although the legislature may adjust the boundaries of a municipal ward

and use the revised ward boundaries instead. Legislative and congressional

redistricting plans enacted pursuant to this procedure are used to elect members of

the legislature and members of Congress in the fall of the second year following the

year of the census.

This bill creates a new procedure for the preparation of legislative and

congressional redistricting plans. The bill directs the Legislative Reference Bureau

to draw redistricting plans based upon standards specified in the bill and establishes

a Redistricting Advisory Commission to perform certain tasks in the redistricting

process. The bill also makes various other changes to the laws governing

redistricting. Significant aspects of the bill include:

Redistricting standards

Under the bill, a redistricting plan drawn by the LRB must satisfy several

criteria, including:

1. The plan must be based on population requirements imposed under the

Wisconsin Constitution and the U.S. Constitution and requirements imposed under

Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act, which, among other things, generally

prohibits redistricting plans from abridging the right to vote on account of race or

color or because a person is a member of a language minority group.

2. The senate and assembly districts established in the plan must satisfy equal

population standards specified in the bill. Among other things, no senate district

may have a population which exceeds that of any other senate district by more than

10 percent and no assembly district may have a population which exceeds that of any

other assembly district by more than 10 percent, unless necessary to maintain

compliance with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Congressional districts

established in the plan must each have a population as nearly equal as practicable

to the ideal population for such districts, while maintaining compliance with Section

2 of the Voting Rights Act.

3. District boundaries under the plan must coincide with municipal ward

boundaries and, to the extent consistent with the Wisconsin Constitution, the U.S.

Constitution, and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, must coincide with the

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Crowley (D) , Doyle (D) , Fields (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Meyers (D) , Milroy (D) , Novak (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wachs (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)

14 cosponsors

Bewley (D) , C. Larson (D) , Carpenter (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Hintz (D) , Johnson (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Miller (D) , Ringhand (D) , Risser (D) , Shilling (D) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Campaigns and Elections and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59

Failed 34–59 Feb 22, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 31, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Vruwink, Crowley, Anderson, Barca, Berceau, Billings, Bowen, Brostoff, Considine, Doyle, Fields, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Kolste, Mason, Meyers, Novak, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Stuck, Subeck, C. Taylor, Wachs, Zamarripa, Zepnick and Milroy; cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Ringhand, Bewley, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Johnson, C. Larson, Miller, Risser, Shilling, L. Taylor, Vinehout and Wirch

  2. Jan 31, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections

  3. Feb 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Hintz added as a coauthor

  4. Apr 3, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Campaigns and Elections and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59

  6. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1