Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 451

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the Uniform Recognition and Enforcement of Canadian Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act and providing a criminal penalty.

Children — Abuse and neglect Court — Procedure Fines International relations Police Sentences and penalties Uniform legislation Women Wood county

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill adopts the Uniform Recognition and Enforcement of Canadian

Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, approved and recommended by the

National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2015. This bill

requires the courts of this state to recognize and enforce civil domestic violence

protection orders issued by Canadian courts.

Current law incorporates the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic

Violence Protection Orders Act, which allows recognition and enforcement of

domestic violence protection orders from other states. This bill expands recognition

to civil domestic protection orders issued by Canadian courts. The bill does not

address recognition of Canadian criminal orders or custody issues. Under this bill,

a law enforcement officer or tribunal can recognize and enforce a civil order issued

by a Canadian court that requires no direct or indirect contact with an individual

protected by a Canadian domestic violence protection order. A Canadian domestic

violence protection order is defined in the bill to mean a judgment or part of a

judgment or order issued in a civil proceeding by a court of Canada that relates to

domestic violence and prohibits a person from 1) being in physical proximity to or

following a protected individual; 2) directly or indirectly contacting or

communicating with a protected individual; 3) being within a certain distance of a

place or location associated with a protected individual; or 4) molesting, annoying,

harassing, or engaging in threatening conduct directed at a protected individual.

The bill provides uniform procedures for enforcement of Canadian domestic

violence protection orders. Under the bill, law enforcement officers must determine

whether there is probable cause to believe that a valid order exists and has been

violated. The bill provides that if a protected individual can provide direct proof of

the existence of a facially valid order, for example, by presenting a paper copy or

accessing an electronic registry, the copy or registry conclusively establishes

probable cause. However, if there is no such direct proof, the bill allows law

enforcement to consider other information and make a determination whether there

is probable cause to believe that a valid protection order exists and has been violated.

If the officer determines that the order cannot be enforced because the person against

whom the order was issued has not received appropriate notice, the officer is required

to provide notice to the protected individual and then make a reasonable effort to

notify the person against whom the order was issued and allow that person an

opportunity to comply with the order.

A person against whom an order is enforced will have sufficient opportunity to

demonstrate that the order is invalid if and when the case is brought before the

enforcing tribunal. Under the bill, a tribunal, defined in the bill as a court, agency,

or other entity authorized to establish, enforce, or modify a domestic protection order,

may issue an order to enforce or refusing to enforce a Canadian domestic violence

protection order following the procedures set forth in current law for enforcement of

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Ballweg (R) , Berceau (D) , Brandtjen (R) , Brostoff (D) , Considine (D) , Fields (D) , Genrich (D) , Jacque (R) , Kulp (R) , Milroy (D) , Mursau (R) , Spiros (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Tusler (R) , Zepnick (D)

6 cosponsors

Barca and Shankland , Johnson (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Olsen (R) , Risser (D) , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Nov 7, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 16, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jul 26, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tusler, Stuck, Anderson, Ballweg, Brandtjen, Berceau, Brostoff, Considine, Fields, Genrich, Jacque, Kulp, Milroy, Mursau, Spiros, Spreitzer, Subeck and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Risser, Wanggaard, Johnson, Olsen and L. Taylor

  2. Jul 26, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Oct 31, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  6. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-9-2017 by Committee on Rules

  8. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  9. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Representatives Barca and Shankland added as coauthors

  10. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  11. Nov 9, 2017 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  12. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Nov 14, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  16. Nov 14, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  17. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  18. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  19. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  23. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  25. Feb 26, 2018 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  26. Feb 26, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-26-2018

  27. Mar 27, 2018 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-27-2018

  28. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 181

  29. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Published 3-29-2018