Assembly Bill 451
The Uniform Recognition and Enforcement of Canadian Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act and providing a criminal penalty
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 28, 2018. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jul 26, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Nov 9, 2017
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 20, 2018
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 181
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Published 3-29-2018”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill adopts the Uniform Recognition and Enforcement of Canadian Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, approved and recommended by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2015. This bill requires the courts of this state to recognize and enforce civil domestic violence protection orders issued by Canadian courts.
Current law incorporates the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, which allows recognition and enforcement of domestic violence protection orders from other states. This bill expands recognition to civil domestic protection orders issued by Canadian courts. The bill does not address recognition of Canadian criminal orders or custody issues. Under this bill, a law enforcement officer or tribunal can recognize and enforce a civil order issued by a Canadian court that requires no direct or indirect contact with an individual protected by a Canadian domestic violence protection order. A Canadian domestic violence protection order is defined in the bill to mean a judgment or part of a judgment or order issued in a civil proceeding by a court of Canada that relates to domestic violence and prohibits a person from 1) being in physical proximity to or following a protected individual; 2) directly or indirectly contacting or communicating with a protected individual; 3) being within a certain distance of a place or location associated with a protected individual; or 4) molesting, annoying, harassing, or engaging in threatening conduct directed at a protected individual.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill provides uniform procedures for enforcement of Canadian domestic violence protection orders. Under the bill, law enforcement officers must determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a valid order exists and has been violated. The bill provides that if a protected individual can provide direct proof of the existence of a facially valid order, for example, by presenting a paper copy or accessing an electronic registry, the copy or registry conclusively establishes probable cause. However, if there is no such direct proof, the bill allows law enforcement to consider other information and make a determination whether there is probable cause to believe that a valid protection order exists and has been violated.
If the officer determines that the order cannot be enforced because the person against whom the order was issued has not received appropriate notice, the officer is required to provide notice to the protected individual and then make a reasonable effort to notify the person against whom the order was issued and allow that person an opportunity to comply with the order.
A person against whom an order is enforced will have sufficient opportunity to demonstrate that the order is invalid if and when the case is brought before the enforcing tribunal. Under the bill, a tribunal, defined in the bill as a court, agency, or other entity authorized to establish, enforce, or modify a domestic protection order, may issue an order to enforce or refusing to enforce a Canadian domestic violence protection order following the procedures set forth in current law for enforcement of domestic protection orders. The bill provides immunity for officials for acts and omissions arising out of the filing or enforcement of a Canadian domestic violence protection order, if the act or omission was a good faith effort to comply with the requirements for filing or enforcement.
This bill includes some modifications from, or additions to, the model language recommended by National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
For example, as recommended by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, this bill provides an optional procedure for filing a Canadian domestic violence protection order, but does not require individuals seeking enforcement of a protection order to file the order. The filing procedures in this bill, however, follow the procedures set forth in current law under the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act rather than the model language. This bill also includes a penalty provision for violation of a condition of a protection order.
Who's behind it
18 lawmakers are its . 11 are Democrats and 7 are Republicans.
6 more lawmakers .
See all 24 names Hide the names
Authors (18)
- Jimmy Anderson · Democrat, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Janel Brandtjen · Republican, Assembly
- Jonathan Brostoff · Democrat, Assembly
- Dave Considine · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Eric Genrich · Democrat, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Mark Spreitzer · Democrat, Senate
- Amanda Stuck · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (6)
- Barca and Shankland
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Family Law vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · Nov 7, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 16, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 28, 2018
The new law was published.
-
Mar 28, 2018
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 181.
-
Mar 27, 2018
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Senate passed it too.
-
Feb 16, 2018
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Nov 14, 2017
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Nov 9, 2017
The Senate received it.
-
Nov 9, 2017
2 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Nov 9, 2017
The Assembly passed it.
-
Nov 7, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Nov 7, 2017
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Oct 31, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jul 26, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Family Law.
-
Jul 26, 2017
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jul 26, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Tusler, Stuck, Anderson, Ballweg, Brandtjen, Berceau, Brostoff, Considine, Fields, Genrich, Jacque, Kulp, Milroy, Mursau, Spiros, Spreitzer, Subeck and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Risser, Wanggaard, Johnson, Olsen and L. Taylor
- Jul 26, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law
- Oct 31, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-9-2017 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 9, 2017 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 14, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Nov 14, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Feb 26, 2018 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Feb 26, 2018 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 2-26-2018
- Mar 27, 2018 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 3-27-2018
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 181
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Published 3-29-2018
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote