Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 456

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: alternative highway project delivery methods; prevailing wage for public works projects; municipal approval of highway roundabouts; local referendum imposing a wheel tax; funding for and audit of the Department of Transportation; granting rule-making authority; and making appropriations. (FE)

Administration, department of — Agency and general functions County Legislative audit bureau Legislative fiscal bureau Legislature — Audit committee, joint legislative Legislature — Committees Legislature — Member Legislature — Procedure Motor vehicle — Taxation or registration Municipality Public works Referendum Road — Construction and repair Road — Expressway Road — Finance Transportation, department of — Administration Transportation, department of — Roads Transportation, department of — Vehicles Wage — Payment

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Alternative project delivery methods

This bill authorizes the Department of Transportation and cities, villages,

towns, counties, and technical colleges (governmental units) to use alternate

methods for delivering projects.

Under current law, the design and construction of projects are generally two

distinct phases. Under this method, often referred to as “design-bid-build,”

governmental units have broad authority to accomplish the design of a project. The

construction of a project must be executed by contract based on bids, with a

governmental unit awarding the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.

Under the bill, in addition to the design-bid-build method, governmental units

are authorized to deliver projects with four alternative methods:

1. “Design-build,” in which architectural, surveying, engineering,

construction, and related services for a project are provided by a single contractor.

2. “Design-build-finance,” in which the design and construction services for a

project are provided by a single entity and financing is provided in whole or in part

by the same entity.

3. “Construction manager-general contractor,” a two-phase method in which

all services unrelated to construction are provided in the first phase by a contractor

who, subject to approval by the governmental unit, also provides construction

services in the second phase.

4. “Fixed-price variable-scope," in which a contractor provides the maximum

amount of work at a cost not to exceed the price fixed by the governmental unit.

The bill creates requirements for soliciting and evaluating proposals using

these methods and awarding contracts to the most qualified bidders. The bill

requires DOT to use these methods to deliver not less than 5 percent of construction

costs of improvement projects by June 30, 2019, not less than 10 percent of

construction costs of improvement projects by June 30, 2021, and not less than 20

percent of construction costs of improvement projects by June 30, 2023.

Prevailing wage

The bill eliminates the state prevailing wage law and the highway prevailing

wage law.

Generally, under the current prevailing wage laws, laborers, workers,

mechanics, and truck drivers employed on the site of certain projects of public works

1) must be paid the prevailing wage rate, as determined by the U.S. Department of

Labor under the federal Davis-Bacon Act; and 2) may not be required or permitted

to work a greater number of hours per day and per week than the prevailing hours

of labor, which is no more than 10 hours per day and 40 hours per week, unless they

are paid 1.5 times their basic rate of pay (commonly referred to as overtime pay) for

all hours worked in excess of the prevailing hours of labor. The prevailing wage laws

include two separate laws: one that applies to certain projects of public works to

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Allen (R) , August (R) , Bernier (R) , Born (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Duchow (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Gannon (R) , Hutton (R) , Jacque (R) , Jagler (R) , Jarchow (R) , Katsma (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Knodl (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Kremer (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Kulp (R) , Murphy (R) , Neylon (R) , Ott (R) , Petersen (R) , Quinn (R) , R. Brooks (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Schraa (R) , Skowronski (R) , Stafsholt (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , Vorpagel (R) , Weatherston (R) , Wichgers (R) , Zimmerman (R)

11 cosponsors

Craig (R) , Darling (R) , Feyen (R) , Kapenga (R) , Lasee (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Nass (R) , Stroebel (R) , Tiffany (R) , Vukmir (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Full history

  1. Jul 26, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sanfelippo, Hutton, Allen, August, Bernier, Born, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Duchow, Felzkowski, Gannon, Jacque, Jagler, Jarchow, Katsma, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kooyenga, Kremer, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Murphy, Neylon, Ott, Petersen, Quinn, Schraa, Skowronski, Stafsholt, Tauchen, Tittl, Tusler, Vorpagel, Weatherston, Wichgers and Zimmerman; cosponsored by Senators Kapenga, Craig, Darling, Feyen, Lasee, LeMahieu, Nass, Stroebel, Tiffany, Wanggaard and Vukmir

  2. Jul 26, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Aug 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 1, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1