Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 547

Permitting and mitigation requirements for nonfederal and artificial wetlands and state assumption of the federal regulatory program governing the discharge of dredged or fill material into navigable waters. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 28, 2018. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 18, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 15, 2018

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 18 to 14

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 183

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Published 3-29-2018”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill exempts nonfederal and artificial wetlands from certain Department of Natural Resources wetland permitting requirements and, if the Environmental Protection Agency delegates to the state the authority to administer its own permit program for the discharge of dredge or fill material into navigable waters, authorizes DNR to assume that authority.

Under current federal law, generally, a person must obtain a permit from the federal government for discharges to wetlands that are under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Federal law requires an applicant to submit with a permit application a certification from the state that the proposed discharge will comply with state water quality standards or that the state has waived such certification.

Read the full summary

In this state, DNR grants this certification by issuing a state wetland permit. Under current law, DNR must issue wetland general permits for discharges of dredged or fill material into certain wetlands and may require a person to apply for and obtain a wetland individual permit if DNR determines that conditions specific to the site require additional restrictions on the discharge in order to provide reasonable assurance that no significant adverse impacts to wetland functional values will occur.

The bill exempts wetlands that are not subject to federal jurisdiction (nonfederal wetlands) from state wetland permitting requirements. Generally speaking, only wetlands that are adjacent to navigable waters are subject to federal jurisdiction. The bill continues to require the mitigation of impacts from a discharge to a nonfederal wetland, which under current law is required before DNR may issue a wetland individual permit.

The bill also excludes artificial wetlands from the definition of a wetland, thereby exempting these wetlands from the permitting and mitigation requirements that apply to the discharge of dredged or fill material into a wetland. Under the bill, an artificial wetland is a nonfederal wetland created by human modifications to the landscape or hydrology and for which DNR has no definitive evidence showing a prior wetland or stream history, but does not include a wetland created under a mitigation requirement. Under current rules promulgated by DNR, only certain artificial wetlands are exempt from the wetland permitting requirements and only if DNR determines that significant functional values are not present.

Under current federal law, a state's governor may apply to the EPA requesting that the state be delegated the authority to administer its own individual and general permit program for the discharge of dredged or fill material into navigable waters, including federal wetlands, in place of the federal regulatory program. This bill authorizes DNR to submit such an application on behalf of and at the direction of the governor and authorizes DNR to assume that authority if the EPA delegates it to the state.

The bill also requires DNR to expend all moneys received prior to the effective date of this bill for the in lieu fee subprogram no later than June 30, 2019, and, effective January 7, 2019, to expend moneys received for the in lieu fee subprogram within 24 months of being credited the moneys. The bill provides that, no later than the third month of each legislative session, DNR is required to provide a report to the governor and the appropriate standing committees of the legislature explaining how the department expended the moneys and, if necessary, why the department failed to expend all of the moneys. Under current law, as part of the mitigation program, DNR may establish an in lieu fee subprogram, under which payments are made to DNR for the purposes of restoring, enhancing, creating, or preserving wetlands or other water resource features.

Who's behind it

14 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 14 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 21 names

Authors (14)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 8 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 13, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 13, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 58 to 39 · Feb 15, 2018 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (58)

No (39)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 16, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 16, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 16, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 18 to 14 · Feb 20, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 14 · Feb 20, 2018

See how each of the 32 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 28, 2018

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 183.

  3. Mar 27, 2018

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 20, 2018

    The Senate passed it too, 18 to 14.

  5. Feb 16, 2018

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 16, 2018

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  7. Feb 16, 2018

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  8. Feb 16, 2018

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  9. Feb 16, 2018

    The Senate received it.

  10. Feb 15, 2018

    The Assembly passed it, 58 to 39.

  11. Feb 15, 2018

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Feb 13, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Feb 13, 2018

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 3.

  14. Jan 17, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Dec 21, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Dec 20, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  17. Oct 18, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform.

  18. Oct 18, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Steineke, Stafsholt, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Felzkowski, Horlacher, Jagler, Jarchow, Knodl, Kremer, Kuglitsch, Rodriguez, Allen and Hutton; cosponsored by Senators Roth, Craig, Feyen, Kapenga, LeMahieu and Lasee

  2. Oct 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform

  3. Dec 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Murphy added as a coauthor

  4. Dec 21, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 30, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Steineke

  7. Jan 31, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Brostoff

  8. Feb 1, 2018 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 9, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 offered by Representative Steineke

  10. Feb 13, 2018 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  11. Feb 13, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  12. Feb 13, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Feb 13, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:02 PM on 2-15-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  14. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adopted

  16. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  18. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 58, Noes 39

  19. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  21. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  22. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  24. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  25. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  26. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Miller, Hansen, Ringhand, Risser, Carpenter, Vinehout, Johnson, Schachtner, Larson, L. Taylor, Wirch, Bewley and Erpenbach

  28. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a second time

  29. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 14

  30. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 14

  33. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Feb 26, 2018 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Substitute Amendment 3)

  36. Feb 26, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-26-2018

  37. Mar 1, 2018 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Substitute Amendment 3)

  38. Mar 1, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-1-2018

  39. Mar 27, 2018 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-27-2018

  40. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 183

  41. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Published 3-29-2018

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote