Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: obtaining crime victim mental health treatment records. (FE)
Court — Procedure Crime victim Mental health
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill creates a procedure by which a defendant in a criminal case may seek
access to the mental health treatment records of a crime victim that are not in the
possession of or under the control of a government entity when he or she believes that
those records contain information that is crucial to the defendant's defense.
Under the bill, if a defendant wishes to gain access to the mental health
treatment records of a crime victim, he or she must file a motion describing the
information sought and show that there are mental health treatment records that
are reasonably likely to contain the information sought, that the information is
necessary to formulate an articulated defense, and that the information is not
available from any other source. If the court finds that the defendant has made this
showing by a preponderance of the evidence and that the potential benefit to the
defendant is greater than the harm to the crime victim from disclosure, and if the
crime victim consents, the court may conduct an in camera review of the mental
health treatment records. Upon reviewing the records, if the court determines by
clear and convincing evidence both that the information in the mental health
treatment records is necessary to any articulated defense and that the benefit to the
defendant from disclosure is greater than the harm to the crime victim from
disclosure, or determines that the evidence is otherwise exculpatory, the court may
order disclosure of the records. Following this order, the crime victim may review the
records that the court has determined should be disclosed and may consent to
disclose the records, may appeal the court's decision, or may decline to disclose the
records and be barred from testifying at the trial.
If the crime victim declines to disclose his or her mental health treatment
records for an in camera review, the court must abide by his or her declination and
must permit the victim to testify at trial. The defendant, however, may then
comment on the declination and draw any reasonable inference therefrom.
All filings and records pertinent to this process and the mental health
treatment records of the victim are to be sealed by the court. Additionally, all
decisions of the court during this process may be appealed at any time by the state
or the crime victim as a matter of right.
This bill also adds enumerated rights to the basic bill of rights for victims
describing the right of a victim to privacy in his or her mental health treatment
records, in accordance with the new procedure that the bill creates.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2
Passed 5–2 Jan 24, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2
Passed 5–2 Jan 24, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 24, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Spiros, Jacque, Berceau, E. Brooks, Mursau, Novak, Petryk, Tauchen and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Wanggaard, Cowles, Harsdorf and Olsen
- Oct 24, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Nov 2, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 20, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Spiros
- Dec 21, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 10, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative C. Taylor
- Jan 11, 2018 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2
- Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2
- Feb 8, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Spiros
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1