Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 570

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: obtaining crime victim mental health treatment records. (FE)

Court — Procedure Crime victim Mental health

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill creates a procedure by which a defendant in a criminal case may seek

access to the mental health treatment records of a crime victim that are not in the

possession of or under the control of a government entity when he or she believes that

those records contain information that is crucial to the defendant's defense.

Under the bill, if a defendant wishes to gain access to the mental health

treatment records of a crime victim, he or she must file a motion describing the

information sought and show that there are mental health treatment records that

are reasonably likely to contain the information sought, that the information is

necessary to formulate an articulated defense, and that the information is not

available from any other source. If the court finds that the defendant has made this

showing by a preponderance of the evidence and that the potential benefit to the

defendant is greater than the harm to the crime victim from disclosure, and if the

crime victim consents, the court may conduct an in camera review of the mental

health treatment records. Upon reviewing the records, if the court determines by

clear and convincing evidence both that the information in the mental health

treatment records is necessary to any articulated defense and that the benefit to the

defendant from disclosure is greater than the harm to the crime victim from

disclosure, or determines that the evidence is otherwise exculpatory, the court may

order disclosure of the records. Following this order, the crime victim may review the

records that the court has determined should be disclosed and may consent to

disclose the records, may appeal the court's decision, or may decline to disclose the

records and be barred from testifying at the trial.

If the crime victim declines to disclose his or her mental health treatment

records for an in camera review, the court must abide by his or her declination and

must permit the victim to testify at trial. The defendant, however, may then

comment on the declination and draw any reasonable inference therefrom.

All filings and records pertinent to this process and the mental health

treatment records of the victim are to be sealed by the court. Additionally, all

decisions of the court during this process may be appealed at any time by the state

or the crime victim as a matter of right.

This bill also adds enumerated rights to the basic bill of rights for victims

describing the right of a victim to privacy in his or her mental health treatment

records, in accordance with the new procedure that the bill creates.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , E. Brooks (R) , Jacque (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Petryk (R) , Spiros (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tusler (R)

5 cosponsors

Cowles (R) , Harsdorf (R) , Olsen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2

Passed 5–2 Jan 24, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2

Passed 5–2 Jan 24, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Spiros, Jacque, Berceau, E. Brooks, Mursau, Novak, Petryk, Tauchen and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Wanggaard, Cowles, Harsdorf and Olsen

  2. Oct 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Nov 2, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Dec 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Spiros

  7. Dec 21, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Jan 10, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative C. Taylor

  9. Jan 11, 2018 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  11. Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  13. Feb 8, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Spiros

  14. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1