Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 572

The collection and maintenance of certain public library data by the Division for Libraries and Technology, authorizing small, rural libraries to apply for information technology block grants and educational technology training grants, and making appropriations. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 14, 2018. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 24, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 94 to 0

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 31 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 142

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 14, 2018: “Published 3-15-2018”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill authorizes the Division for Libraries and Technology in the Department of Public Instruction to collect and maintain public library–related data, including purchasing licenses for data collection software; training staff on the effective use of data; creating tools for libraries to use internally in analyzing, and to report to the public about, library use; and developing and implementing technology systems that allow for interoperable data exchange and automation of work processes.

This bill also makes certain public libraries located in census-defined rural areas and serving municipalities with a population of 20,000 or less eligible to receive grants under the Technology for Educational Achievement program, known as TEACH. Under the TEACH program, the Department of Administration awards information technology block grants to school districts to improve information technology infrastructure and educational technology teacher training grants to school districts to train teachers in the use of educational technology. Under the bill, DOA may award grants to eligible libraries to improve information technology infrastructure in rural libraries and train librarians in rural libraries in the use of educational technology.

Who's behind it

12 lawmakers are its ⁠. 11 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 18 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Rural Development and Mining vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 0 · Jan 10, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Rural Development and Mining, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 94 to 0 · Jan 16, 2018 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (94)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 19, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 19, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 19, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 31 to 0 · Jan 23, 2018

See how each of the 31 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 14, 2018

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 14, 2018

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 142.

  3. Mar 12, 2018

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 23, 2018

    The Senate passed it too, 31 to 0.

  5. Jan 19, 2018

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Jan 19, 2018

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  7. Jan 19, 2018

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  8. Jan 17, 2018

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  9. Jan 16, 2018

    The Senate received it.

  10. Jan 16, 2018

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Jan 16, 2018

    The Assembly passed it, 94 to 0.

  12. Jan 11, 2018

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  13. Jan 10, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  14. Jan 10, 2018

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  15. Dec 28, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Dec 18, 2017

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  17. Nov 16, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  18. Nov 3, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Oct 24, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rural Development and Mining.

  20. Oct 24, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Felzkowski, Swearingen, Loudenbeck, Horlacher, Mursau, Novak, Ripp, Skowronski, Tranel, Tusler, Kooyenga and Considine; cosponsored by Senators Harsdorf, Olsen and Tiffany

  2. Oct 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Rural Development and Mining

  3. Nov 3, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 16, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Nov 17, 2017 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  6. Dec 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Senator Testin added as a cosponsor

  7. Dec 28, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 4, 2018 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jan 10, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Rural Development and Mining, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  10. Jan 10, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Jan 11, 2018 · Assembly

    Representative Shankland added as a coauthor

  12. Jan 11, 2018 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-16-2018 by Committee on Rules

  13. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0

  17. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Representative Barca added as a coauthor

  18. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Jan 16, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Jan 17, 2018 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  21. Jan 17, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Jan 19, 2018 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  23. Jan 19, 2018 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  24. Jan 19, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  25. Jan 19, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-23-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  26. Jan 23, 2018 · Senate

    Read a second time

  27. Jan 23, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Jan 23, 2018 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  29. Jan 23, 2018 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 31, Noes 0

  30. Jan 23, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  32. Jan 30, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 1-30-2018

  33. Mar 12, 2018 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-12-2018

  34. Mar 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-14-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 142

  35. Mar 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Published 3-15-2018

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote