Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 595

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the removal of nonconforming outdoor advertising signs along highways. (FE)

Billboard Transportation, department of — Roads

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill declares certain outdoor advertising signs along highways to be

nonconforming, but does not require the signs to be removed unless certain criteria

are met.

The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising

along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, and current state law

incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions,

the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs within 660 feet of, or

otherwise visible (and intended to be visible) from, the main-traveled way of an

interstate or federal-aid primary highway. However, various exceptions apply to

this prohibition, including exceptions for the following: 1) signs advertising

activities conducted on the property on which the sign is located (on-property signs)

if certain conditions are met; 2) signs in business areas if certain conditions are met

or the signs were erected before March 19, 1972 (business area signs); 3) directional

and other official signs meeting certain criteria (directional signs); and 4) certain

signs located more than 660 feet from the highway (signs outside the adjacent area).

Under current law, the Department of Transportation generally may remove

signs that do not conform to applicable requirements but, for each sign removed,

must pay just compensation to the owner of the sign and to the owner of the land on

which the sign is located. For on-property signs, if the on-property sign was lawful

when it was erected but later does not comply with the applicable requirements for

on-property signs, DOT must declare the sign to be nonconforming but may not

remove the sign unless additional criteria are met. These signs are not subject to

removal for changing the advertising message on the sign or performing customary

maintenance on the sign, but are subject to removal, without compensation, if the

sign is enlarged, replaced, or relocated or if additional signs are erected. For signs

lawfully erected after March 18, 1972, which subsequently become nonconforming,

DOT must require removal of the signs, with compensation, by the end of the fifth

year after they become nonconforming, but only if there are sufficient funds available

to DOT to pay just compensation for the sign removal.

Under this bill, business area signs, directional signs, and signs outside the

adjacent area (together referred to as off-property signs) that were lawfully erected

but that no longer conform to applicable requirements must be declared

nonconforming but are not subject to removal unless additional criteria are met.

These nonconforming off-property signs are not subject to removal for changing the

advertising message on the sign or performing customary maintenance on the sign.

These signs must remain substantially the same as they were on the date they

became nonconforming in order to be exempt from removal by DOT although they

can have an extension temporarily attached to the sign face if certain conditions are

met. “Substantially the same" is defined to mean that, since the sign became

nonconforming, no “substantial change" to the sign has been made. “Substantial

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Allen (R) , Ballweg (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Fields (D) , Horlacher (R) , Jacque (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Kulp (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Vorpagel (R)

4 cosponsors

Feyen (R) , Olsen (R) , Tiffany (R) , Vruwink (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4

Passed 9–4 Feb 15, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4

Passed 9–4 Feb 15, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Mar 15, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Vorpagel, Allen, Ballweg, Felzkowski, Fields, Horlacher, Jacque, Kleefisch, Kulp, Thiesfeldt, Tusler and VanderMeer; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Olsen and Tiffany

  2. Oct 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Nov 15, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Vruwink added as a coauthor

  4. Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Dec 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Dec 15, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Billings

  7. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Vorpagel

  8. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Billings

  9. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Vorpagel

  10. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Billings

  11. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4

  13. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4

  14. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:16 PM on 2-20-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  16. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted

  18. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  21. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Feb 21, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  24. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  26. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a second time

  28. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  30. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  31. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Mar 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  33. Mar 29, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-29-2018

  34. Apr 12, 2018 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-12-2018

  35. Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 320

  36. Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2018