Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 595

The removal of nonconforming outdoor advertising signs along highways. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 17, 2018. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 27, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 20, 2018

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 20, 2018

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 320

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 17, 2018: “Published 4-17-2018”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill declares certain outdoor advertising signs along highways to be nonconforming, but does not require the signs to be removed unless certain criteria are met.

The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, and current state law incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions, the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs within 660 feet of, or otherwise visible (and intended to be visible) from, the main-traveled way of an interstate or federal-aid primary highway. However, various exceptions apply to this prohibition, including exceptions for the following: 1) signs advertising activities conducted on the property on which the sign is located (on-property signs) if certain conditions are met; 2) signs in business areas if certain conditions are met or the signs were erected before March 19, 1972 (business area signs); 3) directional and other official signs meeting certain criteria (directional signs); and 4) certain signs located more than 660 feet from the highway (signs outside the adjacent area).

Read the full summary

Under current law, the Department of Transportation generally may remove signs that do not conform to applicable requirements but, for each sign removed, must pay just compensation to the owner of the sign and to the owner of the land on which the sign is located. For on-property signs, if the on-property sign was lawful when it was erected but later does not comply with the applicable requirements for on-property signs, DOT must declare the sign to be nonconforming but may not remove the sign unless additional criteria are met. These signs are not subject to removal for changing the advertising message on the sign or performing customary maintenance on the sign, but are subject to removal, without compensation, if the sign is enlarged, replaced, or relocated or if additional signs are erected. For signs lawfully erected after March 18, 1972, which subsequently become nonconforming, DOT must require removal of the signs, with compensation, by the end of the fifth year after they become nonconforming, but only if there are sufficient funds available to DOT to pay just compensation for the sign removal.

Under this bill, business area signs, directional signs, and signs outside the adjacent area (together referred to as off-property signs) that were lawfully erected but that no longer conform to applicable requirements must be declared nonconforming but are not subject to removal unless additional criteria are met.

These nonconforming off-property signs are not subject to removal for changing the advertising message on the sign or performing customary maintenance on the sign.

These signs must remain substantially the same as they were on the date they became nonconforming in order to be exempt from removal by DOT although they can have an extension temporarily attached to the sign face if certain conditions are met. “Substantially the same" is defined to mean that, since the sign became nonconforming, no “substantial change" to the sign has been made. “Substantial change" to a sign is defined to mean any of the following: increasing the number of upright supports; changing the physical location; increasing the square footage or area of the sign face, except by adding a temporary extension meeting certain conditions; adding changeable message capability; or adding illumination to a sign that was previously not illuminated. With exceptions, these nonconforming off-property signs are subject to removal, without compensation, if a substantial change is made to the sign, if additional signs are erected, or if the sign is considered “destroyed," as defined under the bill. However, under one exception, if a nonconforming off-property sign is damaged or destroyed by a criminal or tortious act, the sign may be replaced or repaired. The bill also creates several definitions applicable to these nonconforming off-property signs, including a definition of “customary maintenance."

Who's behind it

12 lawmakers are its ⁠. 11 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 4 · Feb 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 4 · Feb 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 17, 2018

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 17, 2018

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 320.

  3. Apr 12, 2018

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 20, 2018

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 15, 2018

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 12, 2018

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Feb 21, 2018

    The Senate received it.

  8. Feb 20, 2018

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Feb 20, 2018

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Feb 15, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Feb 15, 2018

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 4.

  12. Dec 14, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Dec 5, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Nov 15, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Oct 27, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  16. Oct 27, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Vorpagel, Allen, Ballweg, Felzkowski, Fields, Horlacher, Jacque, Kleefisch, Kulp, Thiesfeldt, Tusler and VanderMeer; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Olsen and Tiffany

  2. Oct 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Nov 15, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Vruwink added as a coauthor

  4. Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Dec 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Dec 15, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Billings

  7. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Vorpagel

  8. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Billings

  9. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Vorpagel

  10. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Billings

  11. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4

  13. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4

  14. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:16 PM on 2-20-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  16. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted

  18. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  21. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Feb 21, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  24. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  26. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a second time

  28. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  30. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  31. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Mar 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  33. Mar 29, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-29-2018

  34. Apr 12, 2018 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-12-2018

  35. Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 320

  36. Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2018

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote