Assembly Bill 595
The removal of nonconforming outdoor advertising signs along highways. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 17, 2018. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 27, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 20, 2018
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 20, 2018
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 320
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 17, 2018: “Published 4-17-2018”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill declares certain outdoor advertising signs along highways to be nonconforming, but does not require the signs to be removed unless certain criteria are met.
The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, and current state law incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions, the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs within 660 feet of, or otherwise visible (and intended to be visible) from, the main-traveled way of an interstate or federal-aid primary highway. However, various exceptions apply to this prohibition, including exceptions for the following: 1) signs advertising activities conducted on the property on which the sign is located (on-property signs) if certain conditions are met; 2) signs in business areas if certain conditions are met or the signs were erected before March 19, 1972 (business area signs); 3) directional and other official signs meeting certain criteria (directional signs); and 4) certain signs located more than 660 feet from the highway (signs outside the adjacent area).
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, the Department of Transportation generally may remove signs that do not conform to applicable requirements but, for each sign removed, must pay just compensation to the owner of the sign and to the owner of the land on which the sign is located. For on-property signs, if the on-property sign was lawful when it was erected but later does not comply with the applicable requirements for on-property signs, DOT must declare the sign to be nonconforming but may not remove the sign unless additional criteria are met. These signs are not subject to removal for changing the advertising message on the sign or performing customary maintenance on the sign, but are subject to removal, without compensation, if the sign is enlarged, replaced, or relocated or if additional signs are erected. For signs lawfully erected after March 18, 1972, which subsequently become nonconforming, DOT must require removal of the signs, with compensation, by the end of the fifth year after they become nonconforming, but only if there are sufficient funds available to DOT to pay just compensation for the sign removal.
Under this bill, business area signs, directional signs, and signs outside the adjacent area (together referred to as off-property signs) that were lawfully erected but that no longer conform to applicable requirements must be declared nonconforming but are not subject to removal unless additional criteria are met.
These nonconforming off-property signs are not subject to removal for changing the advertising message on the sign or performing customary maintenance on the sign.
These signs must remain substantially the same as they were on the date they became nonconforming in order to be exempt from removal by DOT although they can have an extension temporarily attached to the sign face if certain conditions are met. “Substantially the same" is defined to mean that, since the sign became nonconforming, no “substantial change" to the sign has been made. “Substantial change" to a sign is defined to mean any of the following: increasing the number of upright supports; changing the physical location; increasing the square footage or area of the sign face, except by adding a temporary extension meeting certain conditions; adding changeable message capability; or adding illumination to a sign that was previously not illuminated. With exceptions, these nonconforming off-property signs are subject to removal, without compensation, if a substantial change is made to the sign, if additional signs are erected, or if the sign is considered “destroyed," as defined under the bill. However, under one exception, if a nonconforming off-property sign is damaged or destroyed by a criminal or tortious act, the sign may be replaced or repaired. The bill also creates several definitions applicable to these nonconforming off-property signs, including a definition of “customary maintenance."
Who's behind it
12 lawmakers are its . 11 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 16 names Hide the names
Authors (12)
- Scott Allen · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Cody Horlacher · Republican, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
- Nancy VanderMeer · Republican, Assembly
- Tyler Vorpagel · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (4)
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
- Don Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment
Passed, 9 to 4 · Feb 15, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 4 · Feb 15, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 15, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 17, 2018
The new law was published.
-
Apr 17, 2018
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 320.
-
Apr 12, 2018
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 20, 2018
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 15, 2018
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Mar 12, 2018
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 21, 2018
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Assembly passed it.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 15, 2018
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 15, 2018
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 4.
-
Dec 14, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 5, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 15, 2017
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 27, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.
-
Oct 27, 2017
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 27, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Vorpagel, Allen, Ballweg, Felzkowski, Fields, Horlacher, Jacque, Kleefisch, Kulp, Thiesfeldt, Tusler and VanderMeer; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Olsen and Tiffany
- Oct 27, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation
- Nov 15, 2017 · Assembly
Representative Vruwink added as a coauthor
- Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Dec 14, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 15, 2017 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Billings
- Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Vorpagel
- Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Billings
- Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Vorpagel
- Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Billings
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 4
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 1:16 PM on 2-20-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 21, 2018 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 12, 2018 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 12, 2018 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 15, 2018 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Mar 15, 2018 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 21, 2018 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 29, 2018 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 3-29-2018
- Apr 12, 2018 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-12-2018
- Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 320
- Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly
Published 4-17-2018
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote