Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 598

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: eligibility for physician, dentist, and health care provider educational loan assistance programs. (FE)

Dentistry Nurses Physician Scholarships and loans University of wisconsin — Regents

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes physicians and dentists who agree to practice in free or

charitable clinics eligible to participate in an educational loan assistance program

administered by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System under

current law. The bill makes similar changes to an educational loan assistance

program for other health care professionals administered by the Board of Regents.

Physicians and dentists.

If a physician agrees to practice at least 32 clinic

hours per week for three years in a rural area or “eligible practice area,” as defined

under current law, the physician is eligible to have some of his or her educational

loans repaid. Up to $100,000 may be repaid for practice in a rural area and up to

$50,000 may be repaid for practice in an eligible practice area. Current law defines

an “eligible practice area” as a primary care or mental health shortage area, as

determined under federal law, an American Indian reservation, or trust land of an

American Indian tribe. Under current law, a dentist is eligible for repayment if he

or she agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural

area or dental health shortage area, as determined under federal law. Up to $50,000

may be repaid for practice in a rural area or dental health shortage area.

The bill amends the definition of “eligible practice area” so that it also includes

a free or charitable clinic. The bill also makes a dentist who practices in a free or

charitable clinic eligible for educational loan repayment. As a result, if a physician

or dentist agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a free

or charitable clinic, the physician or dentist is eligible to have up to $50,000 of his

or her educational loans repaid. The bill defines “free or charitable clinic” as a

safety-net health care organization that uses volunteers and staff to serve

economically disadvantaged individuals who are uninsured, underinsured, or have

limited or no health care access. In addition, the organization must be exempt from

federal taxation or operate as a program component or affiliate of an organization

exempt from federal taxation. The organization must also provide services without

regard to a patient's ability to pay and charge either no fee or a nominal or sliding

fee for services.

Current law requires physicians and dentists who participate in the

educational loan assistance program to agree to care for patients who are insured or

receive health care benefits under governmental programs. The bill also requires

physicians and dentists to agree to care for patients who are uninsured or

underinsured. Current law also requires the Board of Regents to establish priorities

for repayments based on specified considerations if funding is not available to make

repayments to all applicants. Under the bill, if the Board of Regents determines that

a consideration does not apply to applicants who desire to practice in free or

charitable clinics, the Board of Regents must ensure that the priorities do not

disadvantage those applicants.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Berceau (D) , Bernier (R) , Born (R) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , E. Brooks (R) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Horlacher (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Knodl (R) , Kolste (D) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Pope (D) , R. Brooks (R) , Riemer (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Tusler (R)

7 cosponsors

Barca (D) , Bewley (D) , Darling (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Loudenbeck (R) , Vinehout (D) , Vruwink (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 13, Noes 0

Passed 13–0 Jan 25, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kleefisch, Riemer, Bernier, Anderson, Berceau, Born, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Considine, Genrich, Goyke, Horlacher, Kolste, Knodl, Mursau, Novak, Pope, Spreitzer, C. Taylor and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Bewley, L. Taylor and Vinehout

  2. Oct 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 8, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Loudenbeck added as a coauthor

  5. Dec 12, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Dec 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Vruwink added as a coauthor

  7. Dec 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 25, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  9. Jan 25, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:17 PM on 2-20-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  11. Feb 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Jacque

  12. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Representative Barca added as a coauthor

  13. Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  15. Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Kleefisch and Jacque

  16. Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  17. Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Feb 22, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1