Assembly Bill 629
Uniform adult guardianship jurisdiction. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 4, 2018. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 10, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 20, 2018
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 20, 2018
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 187
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 4, 2018: “Published 4-4-2018”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
In 2007, the National Conference of Commissioners of Uniform State Laws approved and recommended the Uniform Adult Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Jurisdiction Act for enactment in all states. This bill incorporates the uniform act into Wisconsin law with some modifications. Generally, the bill addresses court jurisdiction for guardianships of adults. Under the bill, an adult for whom the appointment of a guardian of the person or of the estate is sought is known as the respondent.
Subchapter I: General provisions The bill allows a Wisconsin court to communicate with a court in another state concerning a guardianship. The Wisconsin court may allow the parties to participate in the communication and the bill specifies when and for what the court is required to make a record of that communication. Additionally, in a guardianship, a Wisconsin court may request the court of another state to do certain things including holding an evidentiary hearing, ordering a person in that state to produce evidence or give testimony, or issuing any order necessary to assure a person's appearance in a proceeding or to authorize the release of relevant information. If a court in another state requests that a Wisconsin court do one of the certain things specified in the bill, the bill specifies that the Wisconsin court has jurisdiction for the limited purpose of granting the request or making reasonable efforts to comply with the request. The bill provides a means by which a person in another state may be deposed or allowed to testify in a proceeding in Wisconsin.
Read the full summary Show less
Subchapter II: Jurisdiction For purposes of jurisdiction, the bill defines a respondent's home state as the state in which the respondent was physically present, including any period of temporary absence, for at least six consecutive months immediately before the filing of a petition for a guardianship of the person or estate. If there is no such state, the home state is defined as the state in which the respondent was physically present, including any period of temporary absence, for at least six consecutive months ending within the six months prior to the filing of the petition for guardianship. The bill defines a significant-connection state as a state, other than the home state, with which a respondent has a significant connection other than mere physical presence considering factors specified in the bill. The bill specifies a list of items a court must consider in determining whether a respondent has a significant connection with a particular state. The bill creates the exclusive basis for personal jurisdiction for a Wisconsin court to appoint a guardian of the person or the estate for an adult.
Under the bill, a Wisconsin court has personal jurisdiction to appoint a guardian of the person or the estate for a respondent if any of the following is true:
1) Wisconsin is the respondent's home state; 2) on the date the petition is filed, Wisconsin is a significant-connection state and the respondent does not have a home state, a court of the respondent's home state has declined to exercise jurisdiction because Wisconsin is a more appropriate forum, or the respondent has a home state but a petition is not pending in a court in that state and other circumstances are satisfied; 3) Wisconsin does not have jurisdiction as a home state or significant-connection state but the home state and all significant-connection states have declined to exercise jurisdiction because Wisconsin is the more appropriate forum and jurisdiction in Wisconsin is consistent with the Wisconsin and U.S.
constitutions; or 4) the Wisconsin court meets the requirements for special jurisdiction. Under the bill, a Wisconsin court that otherwise lacks jurisdiction under the bill has special jurisdiction to do any of the following: 1) appoint a temporary guardian under current law standards, procedures, and time lines; 2) issue an order with respect to real or tangible personal property located in Wisconsin;
or 3) appoint a guardian of the person or the estate for a person for whom a provisional order to transfer the proceeding from another state has been issued under certain procedures. The bill requires a Wisconsin court to dismiss a proceeding for appointment of a temporary guardian, either before or after the appointment of the temporary guardian, upon the request of a court of the home state, if Wisconsin was not the respondent's home state on the date the petition for appointment was filed. Except for that requirement to dismiss a proceeding on the appointment of a temporary guardian, a court that has appointed a guardian of the person or issued an order to appoint a guardian of the estate has exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over the proceeding until the court terminates the proceeding or the appointment or order expires. The bill requires that, if a petition for appointment of a guardianship is brought in Wisconsin but Wisconsin is not the respondent's home state, notice of the petition must be given to all of those persons who are entitled to notice under Wisconsin law and the law of the respondent's home state. The bill requires that this notice be given in the same manner as notice is required to be given in Wisconsin.
A Wisconsin court that has jurisdiction to appoint a guardian may decline to exercise its jurisdiction if it determines that another state's court is a more appropriate forum. The bill provides procedures for the Wisconsin court to decline jurisdiction and specifies factors the court must consider in determining whether it is an appropriate forum. The bill specifies actions the court may take if it determines it acquired jurisdiction to appoint a guardian of the person or issue an order to appoint a guardian of the estate because of unjustifiable conduct. In addition, the bill specifies actions the court may and must take if petitions for appointment of a guardian of the person or issuance of an order to appoint a guardian of the estate are filed in more than one state.
Subchapter III: Transfer of guardianship Under the bill, a guardian of the person or the estate appointed in Wisconsin may petition the court to transfer the guardianship to another state. Notice of a transfer petition must be given to the persons that would be entitled to notice of a petition for the appointment of a guardian in Wisconsin. Upon request of the guardian, the individual subject to the guardianship, or a person who is required to be notified of the transfer petition or if the court so decides, the court must hold a hearing on a transfer petition. The bill requires the court to issue an order provisionally granting the transfer petition and to direct the guardian to petition for guardianship in the other state if the court is satisfied that the guardianship will be accepted by the other state's court and if other circumstances are satisfied. Upon the Wisconsin court's receipt of a provisional order accepting the proceeding from the court to which the proceeding is to be transferred and the documents required to terminate a guardianship in Wisconsin, the court must issue a final order confirming the transfer and terminating the guardianship.
Under the bill, to confirm transfer of a guardianship to Wisconsin, the guardian of the person or the estate is required to petition the Wisconsin court to accept the guardianship and include a certified copy of the other state's provisional order of transfer. The bill eliminates the list of additional information required to be included with that petition under current law. Notice of a petition to accept the transfer must be given to those persons entitled to notice of a petition for the appointment of a guardian in both Wisconsin and the state from which the guardianship would be transferred. The bill, therefore, eliminates the list of individuals entitled to notice of receipt and acceptance of a foreign guardianship under current law. Under the bill, upon request of the guardian, the individual subject to the guardianship, or a person required to be notified of the petition to accept the transfer, or on the court's own accord, the court must hold a hearing on the petition to accept the transfer. The bill requires the court to issue a provisional order granting the petition to accept transfer unless a certain objection is made or the guardian is ineligible for appointment in this state. Upon receipt of a final order from a court of another state transferring the proceeding to Wisconsin, the Wisconsin court must issue the final order accepting the proceeding and appointing the guardian in Wisconsin. The court must determine, no later than 60 days after the final order accepting transfer, whether the guardianship needs to be modified to conform to Wisconsin law. If a petitioner requests the expansion of the guardian's powers granted in another state, the court must hold a hearing. In granting a petition to accept transfer, the Wisconsin court must recognize a guardianship order from the other state including the determination of the incapacity of the respondent and the appointment of the guardian. Even if a Wisconsin court denies a petition to accept transfer of a guardianship from another state, the guardian may seek appointment as guardian in Wisconsin under Wisconsin law if the court has jurisdiction to make an appointment other than by reason of the provisional order of transfer. The court may appoint a guardian ad litem at any time to represent the respondent's interests and must appoint a guardian ad litem if there is an objection to a transfer or to the acceptance of a transfer.
Subchapter IV: Registration and recognition of orders from other states Under the bill, a guardian of the person or the estate who has been appointed in another state, whose appointment petition as a guardian is not pending in Wisconsin, and who has notified the appointing court of intent to register, may register the guardianship order in Wisconsin by following certain procedures. Upon registration of a guardianship from another state, the bill allows the guardian to exercise all powers authorized in the order of appointment in Wisconsin, except as prohibited under or limited by Wisconsin laws. Under the bill, a Wisconsin court may grant any relief available to enforce a registered order.
Uniformity The bill requires that consideration be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among the state that enacts it.
Who's behind it
18 lawmakers are its . 11 are Republicans and 7 are Democrats.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 21 names Hide the names
Authors (18)
- Jimmy Anderson · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Jonathan Brostoff · Democrat, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Dianne Hesselbein · Democrat, Senate
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- John Macco · Republican, Assembly
- Beth Meyers · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Todd Novak · Republican, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Stafsholt · Republican, Senate
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (3)
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Mental Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 12 to 0 · Jan 24, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 15, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 4, 2018
The new law was published.
-
Apr 4, 2018
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 187.
-
Apr 2, 2018
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 20, 2018
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 15, 2018
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Mar 12, 2018
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 21, 2018
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Assembly passed it.
-
Jan 24, 2018
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 24, 2018
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.
-
Dec 12, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 20, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 10, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Mental Health.
-
Nov 10, 2017
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 10, 2017 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Skowronski, Brostoff, Stafsholt, Meyers, Novak, Tittl, Kulp, Mursau, Tusler, Ohnstad, Macco, Anderson, Berceau, Kitchens, E. Brooks, Sinicki, R. Brooks and Hesselbein; cosponsored by Senators Stroebel, Olsen and Wirch
- Nov 10, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Mental Health
- Nov 20, 2017 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 12, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 9, 2018 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 1:24 PM on 2-20-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 21, 2018 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 12, 2018 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 12, 2018 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 15, 2018 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Mar 15, 2018 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 21, 2018 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 29, 2018 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 3-29-2018
- Apr 2, 2018 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2018
- Apr 4, 2018 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-3-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 187
- Apr 4, 2018 · Assembly
Published 4-4-2018
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote