Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 635

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: reasonable compensation of a motor vehicle dealer by a motor vehicle manufacturer, importer, or distributor for certain motor vehicle service work.

Garage Motor vehicle — Dealers and finance companies

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes several changes related to motor vehicle manufacturers',

importers', or distributors' (manufacturers') compensation of motor vehicle dealers

(dealers) for certain service work for the manufacturer (covered work).

Under current law, a manufacturer must reasonably compensate a dealer that

performs covered work. Covered work is work to rectify certain product defects,

certain motor vehicle delivery or preparation work, and other work requested or

approved by the manufacturer. The manufacturer must compensate the dealer

based on the dealer's effective nonwarranty labor rate and the average percentage

markup over dealer cost for parts. The effective nonwarranty labor rate is

determined by dividing the total customer labor charges for “qualifying nonwarranty

repairs” by the total number of hours that would be allowed for the repairs if the

repairs were made under the manufacturer's time allowances.

This bill limits qualifying nonwarranty repairs to repairs made to a motor

vehicle of a line make for which the manufacturer provides a warranty. The bill also

excludes several types of motor vehicle work from the definition of qualifying

nonwarranty repair.

Under current law, a claim made by a dealer for compensation for covered work

must be either approved or disapproved within 30 days after the claim is submitted

to the manufacturer, and an approved claim must be paid within 30 days after its

approval. A manufacturer, however, retains the right to audit claims for a period of

one year after the date on which the claim is paid and to charge back any amounts

paid on claims that are false or unsubstantiated.

This bill specifies that a manufacturer may not charge back amounts paid on

claims due to the dealer's failure to comply with requirements of the manufacturer

related to the processing of a warranty claim if the dealer provides reasonable proof

that the work for which the claim is made was actually performed and was covered

work.

This bill also specifies that a manufacturer may not do any of the following for

the purpose of recovering the costs of compensating its dealers for covered work:

1. Increase the price the manufacturer charges its dealers for services or for

vehicles or other goods.

2. Impose a charge or surcharge on its dealers.

3. Reduce a payment that is due from the manufacturer to its dealers.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Barca (D) , Considine (D) , Fields (D) , Meyers (D) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Petryk (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Sinicki (D) , Steffen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , Wachs (D) , Zepnick (D)

9 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Erpenbach (D) , Feyen (R) , Miller (D) , Moulton (R) , Olsen (R) , Shankland (D) , Testin (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Feb 20, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Ballweg, Barca, Considine, Felzkowski, Fields, Meyers, Mursau, Novak, Petryk, Rohrkaste, Sinicki, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Wachs, Zepnick, Steffen and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Darling, Erpenbach, Feyen, Miller, Moulton, Testin and Wanggaard

  2. Nov 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jan 9, 2018 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Representative Felzkowski withdrawn as a coauthor

  5. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  7. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:07 PM on 2-22-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 27

  9. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  10. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Representative Shankland added as a coauthor

  14. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Ballweg

  17. Feb 23, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  19. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1