Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 659

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: increasing a political subdivision's levy limit upon the subtraction of territory from a tax incremental financing district. (FE)

Municipality — Taxation National guard Property tax Revenue, department of

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under this bill, if the Department of Revenue recertifies the tax incremental

base of a tax incremental district because part of its territory is subtracted, the

political subdivision in which the TID is located may increase its levy limit by an

amount equal to the political subdivision's maximum allowable levy for the

preceding year, multiplied by a percentage equal to 50 percent of the amount

determined by dividing the value increment of the TID's territory that was

subtracted by the political subdivision's equalized value, as determined by DOR.

Generally, under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,

village, town, or county may not increase its levy by a percentage that exceeds its

“valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of either zero percent or the

percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized value due to new

construction, less improvements removed. The base amount of a political

subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the actual levy for the

immediately preceding year.

Under one of the current law exceptions, if DOR does not certify a value

increment for a TID as a result of the district's termination, the levy limit otherwise

applicable to the political subdivision is increased by a certain amount.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, DOR calculates the “tax

incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable

property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID

increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a “value

increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in

excess of the base value is called a “tax increment."

Under the current law exception to the levy limit relating to DOR not certifying

a value increment for a TID that is terminated, the allowable increase is an amount

equal to the political subdivision's maximum allowable levy for the preceding year,

multiplied by a percentage equal to 50 percent of the amount determined by dividing

the terminated TID's value increment by the political subdivision's equalized value,

as determined by DOR. This bill allows for a similar adjustment when territory is

subtracted from a TID.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Born (R) , Brandtjen (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Quinn (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Steffen (R) , Subeck (D)

3 cosponsors

Feyen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Stroebel (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Jan 5, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Mar 15, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Mar 15, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Mar 15, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Loudenbeck, Born, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, Kuglitsch, Quinn, Spreitzer, Steffen and Subeck; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Feyen and Stroebel

  2. Nov 20, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means

  3. Nov 30, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 30, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Dec 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 5, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  7. Jan 5, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Jan 5, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Loudenbeck

  9. Jan 18, 2018 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-23-2018 by Committee on Rules

  10. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  11. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Jan 23, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Jan 24, 2018 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  18. Jan 24, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  20. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  21. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  22. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  27. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Mar 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Mar 29, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-29-2018

  30. Apr 2, 2018 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2018

  31. Apr 4, 2018 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-3-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 223

  32. Apr 4, 2018 · Assembly

    Published 4-4-2018