Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 794

Secured residential care centers for children and youth and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 27, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Corrections. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill transfers licensing authority for a secured residential care center for children and youth (SRCCCY) from the Department of Corrections to the Department of Children and Families, requires Milwaukee County to establish or contract for enough SRCCCYs to accommodate all Milwaukee County juveniles who are under a secured correctional placement, and allows other counties to establish or contract for SRCCCYs.

Under current law, a juvenile who has been adjudicated delinquent under the Juvenile Justice Code for the commission of an act that would be punishable by a sentence of six months or more if committed by an adult and who is found to be a danger to the public and to be in need of restrictive custodial placement may receive a correctional placement in a Type 1 juvenile correctional facility or an SRCCCY under the supervision of DOC or in a Type 2 residential care center for children and youth under the supervision of the county department of social services or county department of health services (county department). Under the bill, a juvenile who receives a correctional placement may be placed in a Type 1 juvenile correctional facility under the supervision of DOC or in an SRCCCY under the supervision of either DOC or the county department.

Read the full summary

Under current law, DOC may license a child welfare agency to operate an SRCCCY. Such a license is valid for up to two years. Under the bill, DCF can license a county department or a child welfare agency to operate an SRCCCY. An entity licensed to operate an SRCCCY under the bill may hold in secured custody up to 12 juveniles who have been adjudged delinquent and are under a correctional placement under the Juvenile Justice Code. The bill grants county departments that oversee child welfare the same authority that DOC has under current law to supervise juveniles who are placed in an SRCCCY.

Under the bill, an SRCCCY is generally required to meet the same statutory standards as DCF licensees for shelter care facilities, group homes, child welfare agencies, and residential care centers for children and youth. The bill also grants DCF the authority to promulgate rules establishing the minimum requirements for licensing and operation of an SRCCCY, in consultation with DOC, and authorizes DCF to establish uniform reimbursement rates for services that are offered at an SRCCCY.

Under current law, if a juvenile who has been placed in a Type 2 residential care center for children and youth under the supervision of a county department violates a condition of his or her placement, the juvenile can be transferred to a Type 1 juvenile correctional facility and placed under the supervision of DOC. This bill allows a juvenile in a Type 2 residential care center for children and youth to be transferred to an SRCCCY and to remain under the supervision of the county department. Under current law, if a juvenile who has been placed in a Type 2 residential care center for children and youth under the supervision of DOC violates a condition of his or her placement, the juvenile can be transferred to a Type 1 juvenile correctional facility and remains under the supervision of DOC. Under this bill, if a juvenile who has been placed in a Type 2 residential care center for children and youth under the supervision of DOC violates a condition of his or her placement, the juvenile can be transferred to a Type 1 juvenile correctional facility or an SRCCCY and remains under the supervision of DOC in either placement.

Who's behind it

15 lawmakers are its ⁠. 9 are Democrats and 6 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (15)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 29, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jan 25, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Jan 24, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Jan 23, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Jan 18, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Jan 4, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Dec 27, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Corrections.

  9. Dec 27, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kleefisch, Bowen, Ohnstad, Kolste, Quinn, Krug, Kessler, Kulp, Tauchen, Considine, Subeck, Brostoff, Anderson, Berceau and Tittl; cosponsored by Senators Bewley, Wanggaard, Olsen and L. Taylor

  2. Dec 27, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Corrections

  3. Jan 4, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 18, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 24, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 25, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 29, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate