Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 829

Discrimination based on arrest or conviction record under the fair employment law. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 17, 2018. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 12, 2018

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 20, 2018

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 20, 2018

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 278

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 17, 2018: “Published 4-17-2018”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes to the fair employment law with respect to the ability of state and local governmental agencies to deny a license to an individual based on the individual's arrest or conviction record.

Under the current fair employment law, it is an unlawful act of employment discrimination for a state or local agency that has the authority to grant or deny licenses to refuse to license an individual on the basis of the individual's arrest or conviction record. (The fair employment law defines “license” as “the whole or any part of any permit, certificate, approval, registration, charter or similar form of permission required by a state or local unit of government for the undertaking, practice or continuation of any occupation or profession.”) However, there are a number of exceptions to the fair employment law, including exceptions that allow licensing agencies to 1) deny a license to an individual who is subject to a pending criminal charge if the circumstances of the charge substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular licensed activity; or 2) deny a license to an individual who has been convicted of any felony, misdemeanor, or other offense the circumstances of which substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular licensed activity.

Read the full summary

This bill makes a number of modifications to the fair employment law as it relates to discrimination based on arrest or conviction record in licensing, including all of the following:

1. The bill narrows the exception above that allows for denial of a license due to arrest record so that a licensing agency may only deny a license if the pending charge is for a crime against life and bodily security or one of certain crimes against children. The circumstances of the charge would also have to substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular licensed activity, as under current law.

2. The bill qualifies the exception above that allows for denial of a license due to conviction record in the following ways:

a. The bill prohibits a licensing agency from denying a license under the exception because the individual was adjudicated delinquent for an offense under the Juvenile Justice Code, unless the offense for which the individual was adjudicated delinquent was one of certain crimes against life or bodily security or one of certain crimes against children.

b. If a licensing agency denies a license under the exception, the licensing agency must state its reasons for the denial in writing, and must allow the individual to show evidence of rehabilitation and fitness to engage in the licensed activity as provided in the bill. These requirements, however, do not apply if the conviction was for one of certain crimes against life or bodily security or one of certain crimes against children.

3. The bill requires state agencies that may deny licenses due to an individual's conviction record under the exception to promulgate rules to allow an individual, without having to submit a full application for a license, to apply to the agency for a binding determination of whether he or she would be disqualified from obtaining the license based on his or her conviction record. The bill repeals a similar procedure outlined under current law that applies only to the Real Estate Examining Board.

The changes in the bill to the fair employment law apply only to licensing by licensing agencies, and do not otherwise affect the fair employment law as it applies to decisions about whether to employ an individual based on his or her arrest or conviction record.

Who's behind it

14 lawmakers are its ⁠. 12 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 22 names

Authors (14)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 1 · Feb 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 17, 2018

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 17, 2018

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 278.

  3. Apr 12, 2018

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 20, 2018

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 15, 2018

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 12, 2018

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Feb 21, 2018

    The Senate received it.

  8. Feb 20, 2018

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Feb 20, 2018

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Feb 15, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Feb 15, 2018

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  12. Jan 30, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Jan 22, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Jan 18, 2018

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Jan 17, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jan 16, 2018

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  17. Jan 12, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform.

  18. Jan 12, 2018

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 12, 2018 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Petryk, Berceau, Brostoff, Horlacher, Kitchens, Knodl, Kooyenga, Krug, Kulp, Loudenbeck, Mursau, Spiros, Steffen and Novak; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Feyen, Carpenter, Johnson, Larson, Olsen and Petrowski

  2. Jan 12, 2018 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform

  3. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Senator L. Taylor added as a cosponsor

  4. Jan 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 18, 2018 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petryk

  8. Jan 30, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Feb 1, 2018 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  11. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  12. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:52 PM on 2-20-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  14. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  16. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  18. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  19. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Feb 21, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  21. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  22. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  24. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  29. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Mar 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  31. Mar 30, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-30-2018

  32. Apr 12, 2018 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-12-2018

  33. Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 278

  34. Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2018

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote