Assembly Bill 829
Discrimination based on arrest or conviction record under the fair employment law. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 17, 2018. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 12, 2018
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 20, 2018
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 20, 2018
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 278
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 17, 2018: “Published 4-17-2018”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes various changes to the fair employment law with respect to the ability of state and local governmental agencies to deny a license to an individual based on the individual's arrest or conviction record.
Under the current fair employment law, it is an unlawful act of employment discrimination for a state or local agency that has the authority to grant or deny licenses to refuse to license an individual on the basis of the individual's arrest or conviction record. (The fair employment law defines “license” as “the whole or any part of any permit, certificate, approval, registration, charter or similar form of permission required by a state or local unit of government for the undertaking, practice or continuation of any occupation or profession.”) However, there are a number of exceptions to the fair employment law, including exceptions that allow licensing agencies to 1) deny a license to an individual who is subject to a pending criminal charge if the circumstances of the charge substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular licensed activity; or 2) deny a license to an individual who has been convicted of any felony, misdemeanor, or other offense the circumstances of which substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular licensed activity.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill makes a number of modifications to the fair employment law as it relates to discrimination based on arrest or conviction record in licensing, including all of the following:
1. The bill narrows the exception above that allows for denial of a license due to arrest record so that a licensing agency may only deny a license if the pending charge is for a crime against life and bodily security or one of certain crimes against children. The circumstances of the charge would also have to substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular licensed activity, as under current law.
2. The bill qualifies the exception above that allows for denial of a license due to conviction record in the following ways:
a. The bill prohibits a licensing agency from denying a license under the exception because the individual was adjudicated delinquent for an offense under the Juvenile Justice Code, unless the offense for which the individual was adjudicated delinquent was one of certain crimes against life or bodily security or one of certain crimes against children.
b. If a licensing agency denies a license under the exception, the licensing agency must state its reasons for the denial in writing, and must allow the individual to show evidence of rehabilitation and fitness to engage in the licensed activity as provided in the bill. These requirements, however, do not apply if the conviction was for one of certain crimes against life or bodily security or one of certain crimes against children.
3. The bill requires state agencies that may deny licenses due to an individual's conviction record under the exception to promulgate rules to allow an individual, without having to submit a full application for a license, to apply to the agency for a binding determination of whether he or she would be disqualified from obtaining the license based on his or her conviction record. The bill repeals a similar procedure outlined under current law that applies only to the Real Estate Examining Board.
The changes in the bill to the fair employment law apply only to licensing by licensing agencies, and do not otherwise affect the fair employment law as it applies to decisions about whether to employ an individual based on his or her arrest or conviction record.
Who's behind it
14 lawmakers are its . 12 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.
8 more lawmakers .
See all 22 names Hide the names
Authors (14)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Jonathan Brostoff · Democrat, Assembly
- Cody Horlacher · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Loudenbeck · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Todd Novak · Republican, Assembly
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- David Steffen · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (8)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote on an amendment
Passed, 8 to 1 · Feb 15, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 15, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 15, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 17, 2018
The new law was published.
-
Apr 17, 2018
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 278.
-
Apr 12, 2018
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 20, 2018
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 15, 2018
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Mar 12, 2018
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 21, 2018
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Assembly passed it.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 15, 2018
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 15, 2018
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.
-
Jan 30, 2018
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 22, 2018
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 18, 2018
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 17, 2018
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 16, 2018
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Jan 12, 2018
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform.
-
Jan 12, 2018
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 12, 2018 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Petryk, Berceau, Brostoff, Horlacher, Kitchens, Knodl, Kooyenga, Krug, Kulp, Loudenbeck, Mursau, Spiros, Steffen and Novak; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Feyen, Carpenter, Johnson, Larson, Olsen and Petrowski
- Jan 12, 2018 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform
- Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly
Senator L. Taylor added as a cosponsor
- Jan 17, 2018 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 18, 2018 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 22, 2018 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petryk
- Jan 30, 2018 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 1, 2018 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 1
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 15, 2018 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 1:52 PM on 2-20-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 21, 2018 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 12, 2018 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 12, 2018 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 15, 2018 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Mar 15, 2018 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 21, 2018 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 30, 2018 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 3-30-2018
- Apr 12, 2018 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-12-2018
- Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 278
- Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly
Published 4-17-2018
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote